From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55700) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAzB4-0000ge-Pk for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 04:53:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAzAz-0003au-QG for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 04:53:54 -0500 Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([86.62.121.231]:54147) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAzAz-0003an-Ik for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 04:53:49 -0500 Message-ID: <52F20A2C.2090101@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 13:53:48 +0400 From: Michael Tokarev MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu: Broken -smb with latest SAMBA package. (Unsupported security=share option) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka , Qemu Development List On Sun, 03 Nov 2013 21:06:22 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2013-11-01 11:10, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> 01.11.2013 13:54, Michael B=C3=BCsch wrote: >>> On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 13:32:49 +0400 >>> Michael Tokarev wrote: >>> >>>> That looks right. Are you okay adding your Signed-off-by to the pat= ch >>>> you initially submitted? If yes, I'll make a formal patch submissio= n >>>> upstream. >>> >>> Here you go. >> >> Thank you! >> >> Adding Jan as slirp maintainer, and my >> >> Reviewed-by: Michael Tokarev >> >> If Jan picks it up, that's fine. If not, I think it can go >> to the trivial patches queue. > > Works fine, applied to queues/slirp. > > But this is not a trivial patch as the fix is not obvious for a reader > (unless you know smb.conf semantics by heart). Jan, did you forget to push the queue? Its been more than 2 months ago, and qemu git is still not fixed? Thanks, /mjt