From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754507AbaBFDil (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2014 22:38:41 -0500 Received: from mail-qa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.216.44]:43515 "EHLO mail-qa0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751296AbaBFDij (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2014 22:38:39 -0500 Message-ID: <52F303BD.3040704@opersys.com> Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 22:38:37 -0500 From: Karim Yaghmour User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: Steven Rostedt , Mathieu Desnoyers , tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com, "zhangwei(Jovi)" Subject: Logging/buffering mechanism comparison? (ring buffer, relay, etc.) X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Just wondering if anyone had some pointers on a comparison between the various logging/buffering mechanisms out there (ring buffer, relay, lttng buffering, etc.)? Googling was inconclusive. Anything that has benchmarks/pros/cons would be great. Thanks, -- Karim Yaghmour CEO - Opersys inc. / www.opersys.com http://twitter.com/karimyaghmour