From: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Cc: Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PPC: powernv: remove redundant cpuidle_idle_call()
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:15:04 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F84B40.8090403@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140207124140.GB9987@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Hi Peter,
On 02/07/2014 06:11 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 05:11:26PM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
>> But observe the idle state "snooze" on powerpc. The power that this idle
>> state saves is through the lowering of the thread priority of the CPU.
>> After it lowers the thread priority, it is done. It cannot
>> "wait_for_interrupts". It will exit my_idle(). It is now upto the
>> generic idle loop to increase the thread priority if the need_resched
>> flag is set. Only an interrupt routine can increase the thread priority.
>> Else we will need to do it explicitly. And in such states which have a
>> polling nature, the cpu will not receive a reschedule IPI.
>>
>> That is why in the snooze_loop() we poll on need_resched. If it is set
>> we up the priority of the thread using HMT_MEDIUM() and then exit the
>> my_idle() loop. In case of interrupts, the priority gets automatically
>> increased.
>
> You can poll without setting TS_POLLING/TIF_POLLING_NRFLAGS just fine
> and get the IPI if that is what you want.
>
> Depending on how horribly unprovisioned the thread gets at the lowest
> priority, that might actually be faster than polling and raising the
> prio whenever it does get ran.
So I am assuming you mean something like the below:
my_idle()
{
local_irq_enable();
/* Remove the setting of the polling flag */
HMT_low();
return index;
}
And then exit into the generic idle loop. But the issue I see here is
that the TS_POLLING/TIF_POLLING_NRFLAGS gets set immediately. So, if on
testing need_resched() immediately after this returns that the
TIF_NEED_RESCHED flag is set, the thread will exit at low priority right?
We could raise the priority of the thread in arch_cpu_idle_exit() soon
after setting the polling flag but that would mean for cases where the
TIF_NEED_RESCHED flag is not set we unnecessarily raise the priority of
the thread.
Thanks
Regards
Preeti U Murthy
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-10 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-06 14:16 [PATCH 1/2] PPC: powernv: remove redundant cpuidle_idle_call() Nicolas Pitre
2014-02-06 14:16 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-02-06 14:16 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-02-06 14:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM64: " Nicolas Pitre
2014-02-06 14:16 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-02-06 14:16 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-02-06 14:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-06 14:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-06 14:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-06 15:59 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-06 15:59 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-06 15:59 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-06 16:09 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-02-06 16:09 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-02-06 16:09 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-02-06 16:20 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-06 16:20 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-07 9:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-02-07 9:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-02-07 9:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-02-06 14:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] PPC: " Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-06 14:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-06 14:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-06 15:56 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-06 15:56 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-06 15:56 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-06 16:25 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-06 16:25 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-06 16:49 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-06 16:49 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-06 16:49 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-07 1:17 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-02-07 1:17 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-02-07 1:17 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-02-07 5:27 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-07 5:27 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-07 10:48 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-02-07 11:41 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-07 12:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-10 3:45 ` Preeti U Murthy [this message]
2014-02-07 7:01 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-07 7:01 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-07 9:45 ` Deepthi Dharwar
2014-02-07 9:45 ` Deepthi Dharwar
2014-02-07 11:00 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-07 11:00 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-14 11:17 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-14 11:17 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-14 11:17 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-14 11:25 ` Deepthi Dharwar
2014-02-14 11:25 ` Deepthi Dharwar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52F84B40.8090403@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.