From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nathan_Lynch@mentor.com (Nathan Lynch) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:57:19 -0600 Subject: [RFC/PATCH v2] ARM: vDSO gettimeofday using generic timer architecture In-Reply-To: <20140209102023.GL26684@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1391814349-10706-1-git-send-email-nathan_lynch@mentor.com> <20140209102023.GL26684@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <52F9675F.1040403@mentor.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 02/09/2014 04:20 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 05:05:49PM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote: >> + /* Grab the vDSO code pages. */ >> + for (i = 0; i < vdso_pages; i++) { >> + pg = virt_to_page(&vdso_start + i*PAGE_SIZE); >> + ClearPageReserved(pg); >> + get_page(pg); >> + vdso_pagelist[i] = pg; >> + } > > Why do we want to clear the reserved status? This looks over complicated > to me. > >> + >> + /* Sanity check the shared object header. */ >> + vbase = vmap(vdso_pagelist, 1, 0, PAGE_KERNEL); >> + if (vbase == NULL) { >> + pr_err("Failed to map vDSO pagelist!\n"); >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + } else if (memcmp(vbase, "\177ELF", 4)) { >> + pr_err("vDSO is not a valid ELF object!\n"); >> + ret = -EINVAL; >> + goto unmap; >> + } > > Why do we need to vmap() pages which are already accessible - vdso_start > must be part of the kernel image, and therefore will be accessible via > standard mappings. Right, this stuff doesn't appear to be necessary. Removed the vmap, get_page, and ClearPageReserved calls for v3. >> +static long clock_gettime_fallback(clockid_t _clkid, struct timespec *_ts) >> +{ >> + register struct timespec *ts asm("r1") = _ts; >> + register clockid_t clkid asm("r0") = _clkid; >> + register long ret asm ("r0"); >> + register long nr asm("r7") = __NR_clock_gettime; >> + >> + asm("swi #0" : "=r" (ret) : "r" (clkid), "r" (ts), "r" (nr) : "memory"); > > This isn't compatible with OABI, so either this must not be enabled when > AEABI is disabled, or this needs to be fixed. Okay. I'll plan on making the vdso code depend on CONFIG_AEABI, likely indirectly via a CONFIG_VDSO Kconfig option. Since you'll need an updated C library to actually benefit from the vdso, I doubt any OABI support in this code would get any use. Thanks for reviewing.