diff for duplicates of <52F99056.6010906@samsung.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 060abfc..35b6c41 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -5,12 +5,12 @@ On 02/13/14 04:14, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>>> One reason to keep around ARCH_* is for drivers shared between arm and arm64 that depend on it. >>> >>> We already converted some of them (those depending on ARCH_VEXPRESS) to ->>> just depend on ARM64. Ideally, at some point I’d like to see them as ->>> defaulting to modules but I don’t think we are there yet (we had some ->>> discussions at the last KS, I’m not sure anyone started looking into +>>> just depend on ARM64. Ideally, at some point I?d like to see them as +>>> defaulting to modules but I don?t think we are there yet (we had some +>>> discussions at the last KS, I?m not sure anyone started looking into >>> this). >> ->> I’m torn about this, I think for something like VEXPRESS it makes sense, +>> I?m torn about this, I think for something like VEXPRESS it makes sense, >> however I think its reasonable to still have an config symbol for a full >> SoC family or something of that nature. > diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index f1aefe2..4ca560b 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -2,18 +2,10 @@ "ref\01540B9A3-2485-4149-81DD-7D86A532E5D4@arm.com\0" "ref\0D225ECFF-E2A7-44C9-8D11-20EE77077797@codeaurora.org\0" "ref\02286031.FWmKXGrGIV@wuerfel\0" - "From\0Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: Add Kconfig option for Samsung GH7 SoC family\0" + "From\0kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH 2/3] arm64: Add Kconfig option for Samsung GH7 SoC family\0" "Date\0Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:52:06 +0900\0" - "To\0Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>\0" - "Cc\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" - linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org> - Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - Ilho Lee <ilho215.lee@samsung.com> - Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com> - Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org> - Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> - " Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 02/13/14 04:14, Arnd Bergmann wrote:\n" @@ -23,12 +15,12 @@ ">>>> One reason to keep around ARCH_* is for drivers shared between arm and arm64 that depend on it.\n" ">>>\n" ">>> We already converted some of them (those depending on ARCH_VEXPRESS) to\n" - ">>> just depend on ARM64. Ideally, at some point I\342\200\231d like to see them as\n" - ">>> defaulting to modules but I don\342\200\231t think we are there yet (we had some\n" - ">>> discussions at the last KS, I\342\200\231m not sure anyone started looking into\n" + ">>> just depend on ARM64. Ideally, at some point I?d like to see them as\n" + ">>> defaulting to modules but I don?t think we are there yet (we had some\n" + ">>> discussions at the last KS, I?m not sure anyone started looking into\n" ">>> this).\n" ">>\n" - ">> I\342\200\231m torn about this, I think for something like VEXPRESS it makes sense,\n" + ">> I?m torn about this, I think for something like VEXPRESS it makes sense,\n" ">> however I think its reasonable to still have an config symbol for a full\n" ">> SoC family or something of that nature.\n" ">\n" @@ -42,4 +34,4 @@ "\n" - Kukjin -7c36bdba0fc7d401618b6c0da085c0d5e5af6c60a1e7cd646ad84999b4999ed1 +2fef710641f0920792ec25acc00363e9dad1746eba67af727af75336e63db6a7
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.