Re: [PATCH 3/5] ceph: fix ceph_removexattr()

[Alex Elder <elder@ieee.org>]

On 02/10/2014 11:30 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>

You need a better explanation than "fix."

We have the ENODATA thing (versus ENOATTR), but again
what you have is fine.

> ---
>  fs/ceph/xattr.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/xattr.c b/fs/ceph/xattr.c
> index 6ed0e5a..79f9c12 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/xattr.c
> @@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ static int __remove_xattr(struct ceph_inode_info *ci,
>  			  struct ceph_inode_xattr *xattr)
>  {
>  	if (!xattr)
> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +		return -ENODATA;

It seems like this could be a void function, and the (one) caller
could check for null before making the call.

Either way though, this looks good.

Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>


>  
>  	rb_erase(&xattr->node, &ci->i_xattrs.index);
>  
>