From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] drm/tegra: Restore licensing consistency Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:46:57 -0700 Message-ID: <52FBA581.3000707@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1392190238-1717-1-git-send-email-treding@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1392190238-1717-1-git-send-email-treding-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Thierry Reding , dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org Cc: linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On 02/12/2014 12:30 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: > The bulk of the Tegra DRM driver is GPL v2 licensed, but some of the new > subdrivers were licensed under an MIT license. This was simply oversight > on my part. > > One exception to this is the public header file that will eventually be > used within libdrm. Since all the other headers in libdrm use the MIT > license, do the same for Tegra. The series, Acked-by: Stephen Warren I guess this needs explicit acks from the following people outside NVIDIA who touched these files:? Wei Yongjun (dsi.c) Emil Goode (tegra_drm.h)