From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: mstp10 clock bug
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 19:01:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52FBC50D.4000907@codethink.co.uk> (raw)
William and I have been looking at the clock bug on mstp10_clks
from the sound.git patch which reverts all the clocks [1]
What happens is that when register the node:
> - mstp10_clks: mstp10_clks@e6150998 {
> - compatible = "renesas,r8a7790-mstp-clocks", "renesas,cpg-mstp-clocks";
> - reg = <0 0xe6150998 0 4>, <0 0xe61509a8 0 4>;
> - clocks = <&p_clk>, <&mstp10_clks R8A7790_CLK_SSI>,
> - <&mstp10_clks R8A7790_CLK_SSI>, <&mstp10_clks R8A7790_CLK_SSI>,
> - <&mstp10_clks R8A7790_CLK_SSI>, <&mstp10_clks R8A7790_CLK_SSI>,
> - <&mstp10_clks R8A7790_CLK_SSI>, <&mstp10_clks R8A7790_CLK_SSI>,
> - <&mstp10_clks R8A7790_CLK_SSI>, <&mstp10_clks R8A7790_CLK_SSI>,
> - <&mstp10_clks R8A7790_CLK_SSI>;
> - #clock-cells = <1>;
> - renesas,clock-indices = <
> - R8A7790_CLK_SSI R8A7790_CLK_SSI9 R8A7790_CLK_SSI8
> - R8A7790_CLK_SSI7 R8A7790_CLK_SSI6 R8A7790_CLK_SSI5
> - R8A7790_CLK_SSI4 R8A7790_CLK_SSI3 R8A7790_CLK_SSI2
> - R8A7790_CLK_SSI1 R8A7790_CLK_SSI0
> - >;
> - clock-output-names > - "ssi", "ssi9", "ssi8", "ssi7", "ssi6", "ssi5",
> - "ssi4", "ssi3", "ssi2", "ssi1", "ssi0";
> - };
> };
The ssi5 clock is registered with a parent of ssi5, not ssi as described
in the above node.
This is due to of_clk_get_parent_name() reading the clock-output-names
property and _assuming_ a 1:1 correspondence for the clock index to the
clock-output-names position. In the case of the mstp clocks each of
these nodes has sparse entries, which means the following:
<&mstp10_clks R8A7790_CLK_SSI> R8A7790_CLK_SSI becomes <&mstp10_clks 5>
and the 5th entry in clock-output-names is "ssi5".
This means that the entire machine comes to a halt as the clock layer
tries to create a clock with itself as a parent (never a good idea)
Currently we do not know the best way to fix this.
- we could update the of_clk_get_parent_name() to check the presence of
renesas,clock-indices which would be a hack.
- allow the clock driver to register a parent name callback, but that
would assume we never looked up nodes that where not registered yet.
- change all the clock-output-names arrays for rcar dtsi files to have
null entries where needed, which would be not nice.
- add a new property for mapping numbers to clock indicies and moving
the renesas,clock-indices to use that (although that would still end
up causing a number of issues with the clock handling as is)
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git/commit/?h=topic/rcar&idp8d2aa14d1eefef3dd758242787e837485baad7
--
Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius
next reply other threads:[~2014-02-12 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-12 19:01 Ben Dooks [this message]
2014-02-13 14:51 ` mstp10 clock bug Laurent Pinchart
2014-02-13 17:43 ` Ben Dooks
2014-02-13 23:03 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52FBC50D.4000907@codethink.co.uk \
--to=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.