From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
Cc: Yang Z Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pvh: Fix regression caused by assumption that HVM paths MUST use io-backend device.
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:08:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52FCEDFC.7080103@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52FCFAD9020000780011C2AB@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 02/13/2014 04:03 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 13.02.14 at 16:38, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>> Konrad / Jan: Ping?
>>
>> If this fix looks reasonable it would be nice to get this in before RC4.
> It would have long been committed if the VMX maintainers finally
> gave their okay. Even privately pinging them didn't seem to help...
Oh, right, I forgot that Yang isn't a maintainer.
Well it looks like we have two options:
* Commit it without a maintainer's ack
* Revert the patch that caused the regression to PVH.
(Or maybe Yang can chase the maintainers internally.)
-George
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-13 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-03 17:03 [PATCH] Xen 4.4-rc3 regression with PVH compared to Xen 4.4-rc2 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-03 17:03 ` [PATCH] pvh: Fix regression caused by assumption that HVM paths MUST use io-backend device Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-04 8:54 ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-04 14:48 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-04 15:02 ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-04 15:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-04 15:46 ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-04 16:42 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-05 14:35 ` George Dunlap
2014-02-05 15:00 ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-05 15:26 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-07 2:28 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2014-02-07 15:41 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-10 12:40 ` George Dunlap
2014-02-11 0:17 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2014-02-13 15:38 ` George Dunlap
2014-02-13 16:03 ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-13 16:08 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2014-02-13 17:00 ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-03 19:26 ` [PATCH] Xen 4.4-rc3 regression with PVH compared to Xen 4.4-rc2 Mukesh Rathor
2014-02-03 19:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-03 20:01 ` Mukesh Rathor
2014-02-04 1:16 ` Mukesh Rathor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52FCEDFC.7080103@eu.citrix.com \
--to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=konrad@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.