From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51484) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WEF6H-0004OC-11 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 04:30:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WEF69-0005hR-HB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 04:30:24 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-f174.google.com ([209.85.192.174]:53934) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WEF69-0005hK-BY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 04:30:17 -0500 Received: by mail-pd0-f174.google.com with SMTP id z10so11795425pdj.33 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 01:30:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52FDE224.80705@ozlabs.ru> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 20:30:12 +1100 From: Alexey Kardashevskiy MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1390369426-6462-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <52F9D4D6.7070002@ozlabs.ru> <52FA13A8.3040100@suse.de> <52FA14B0.3000602@ozlabs.ru> In-Reply-To: <52FA14B0.3000602@ozlabs.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] spapr: fix H_SET_MODE List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 02/11/2014 11:16 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > On 02/11/2014 11:12 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> On 02/11/2014 08:44 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>> On 01/22/2014 04:43 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>>> This fixes H_SET_MODE. >>>> >>>> Alexey Kardashevskiy (3): >>>> target-ppc: introduce powerisa-207-server flag >>>> spapr-hcall: fix little-endian resource handling in H_SET_MODE >>>> spapr-hcall: add address-translation-mode-on-interrupt resource in >>>> H_SET_MODE >>>> >>>> hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c | 64 >>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ >>>> include/hw/ppc/spapr.h | 9 +++++-- >>>> target-ppc/cpu.h | 4 +++ >>>> target-ppc/translate_init.c | 3 ++- >>>> 4 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >>> Ping? >> >> Why are you pinging? There were review comments on this patch set, no? Have I answered these questions? Or am I still missing some review comments? Or what? Thanks. > > > I saw question from Aneesh (which does not require a change, I believe) and > that is it. What did I miss? -- Alexey