From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45325) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WENI4-0006D6-W0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:15:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WENI0-00026q-0f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:15:08 -0500 Received: from mail-ph.de-nserver.de ([85.158.179.214]:51747) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WENHz-00024d-M2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:15:03 -0500 Message-ID: <52FE5D35.4070209@profihost.ag> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 19:15:17 +0100 From: Stefan Priebe MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <52FA399F.6070802@profihost.ag> <182FA0E4-ADDC-4112-842B-83957D7DD863@kamp.de> <52FA6CCE.2020703@profihost.ag> <20140214145900.GK17391@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20140214145900.GK17391@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] memory allocation of migration changed? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Orit Wasserman , Peter Lieven , qemu-devel , Dave Gilbert , Juan Quintela Am 14.02.2014 15:59, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:32:46PM +0100, Stefan Priebe wrote: >> Am 11.02.2014 17:22, schrieb Peter Lieven: >>> >>> >>>> Am 11.02.2014 um 16:44 schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi : >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG >>>> wrote: >>>>> in the past (Qemu 1.5) a migration failed if there was not enogh memory >>>>> on the target host available directly at the beginning. >>>>> >>>>> Now with Qemu 1.7 i've seen succeeded migrations but the kernel OOM >>>>> memory killer killing qemu processes. So the migration seems to takes >>>>> place without having anough memory on the target machine? >>>> >>>> How much memory is the guest configured with? How much memory does >>>> the host have? >>>> >>>> I wonder if there are zero pages that can be migrated almost "for >>>> free" and the destination host doesn't touch. When they are touched >>>> for the first time after migration handover, they need to be allocated >>>> on the destination host. This can lead to OOM if you overcommitted >>>> memory. >>>> >>>> Can you reproduce the OOM reliably? It should be possible to debug it >>>> and figure out whether it's just bad luck or a true regression. >>>> >>>> Stefan >>> >>> Kernel Version would also be interesting as well as thp and ksm settings. >> >> Kernel Host: 3.10.26 >> >> What's thp / ksm? how to get those settings? > > Transparent Huge Pages > > # cat /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled > > Kernel Samepage Merging > > # cat /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/run # cat /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled [always] madvise never # cat /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/run 1 > > Stefan >