Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] mm: store zero pages to be swapped out in a bitmap

[Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>]

On 13/06/2024 22:21, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 5:18 AM Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Going back to the v1 implementation of the patchseries. The main reason
>> is that a correct version of v2 implementation requires another rmap
>> walk in shrink_folio_list to change the ptes from swap entry to zero pages to
>> work (i.e. more CPU used) [1], is more complex to implement compared to v1
>> and is harder to verify correctness compared to v1, where everything is
>> handled by swap.
>>
>> ---
>> As shown in the patchseries that introduced the zswap same-filled
>> optimization [2], 10-20% of the pages stored in zswap are same-filled.
>> This is also observed across Meta's server fleet.
>> By using VM counters in swap_writepage (not included in this
>> patchseries) it was found that less than 1% of the same-filled
>> pages to be swapped out are non-zero pages.
>>
>> For conventional swap setup (without zswap), rather than reading/writing
>> these pages to flash resulting in increased I/O and flash wear, a bitmap
>> can be used to mark these pages as zero at write time, and the pages can
>> be filled at read time if the bit corresponding to the page is set.
>>
>> When using zswap with swap, this also means that a zswap_entry does not
>> need to be allocated for zero filled pages resulting in memory savings
>> which would offset the memory used for the bitmap.
>>
>> A similar attempt was made earlier in [3] where zswap would only track
>> zero-filled pages instead of same-filled.
>> This patchseries adds zero-filled pages optimization to swap
>> (hence it can be used even if zswap is disabled) and removes the
>> same-filled code from zswap (as only 1% of the same-filled pages are
>> non-zero), simplifying code.
>>
>> This patchseries is based on mm-unstable.
> Aside from saving swap/zswap space and simplifying the zswap code
> (thanks for that!), did you observe any performance benefits from not
> having to go into zswap code for zero-filled pages?
>
> In [3], I observed ~1.5% improvement in kernbench just by optimizing
> zswap's handling of zero-filled pages, and that benchmark only
> produced around 1.5% zero-filled pages. I imagine avoiding the zswap
> code entirely, and for workloads that have 10-20% zero-filled pages,
> the performance improvement should be more pronounced.
>
> When zswap is not being used and all swap activity translates to IO, I
> imagine the benefits will be much more significant.
>
> I am curious if you have any numbers with or without zswap :)

Apart from tracking zero-filled pages (using inaccurate counters not in 
this series) which had the same pattern to zswap_same_filled_pages, the 
nvme writes went down around 5-10% during stable points in the 
production experiment. The performance improved by 2-3% at some points, 
but this is comparing 2 sets of machines running production workloads 
(which can vary between machine sets), so I would take those numbers 
cautiously and which is why I didnt include them in the cover letter.