All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland Dreier <roland@topspin.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tom L Nguyen <tom.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rename CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR to CONFIG_PCI_MSI
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:39:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52llh65r6s.fsf@topspin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200407261615.52261.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> (Bjorn Helgaas's message of "Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:15:52 -0600")

    Bjorn> Rename CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR to CONFIG_PCI_MSI.  The
    Bjorn> "vector" terminology is architecture-dependent.  The PCI
    Bjorn> MSI interface actually deals with Linux IRQ numbers (i.e.,
    Bjorn> things you can pass to request_irq()), and we shouldn't
    Bjorn> confuse things by calling them "vectors" just because we're
    Bjorn> using MSI rather than an IOSAPIC.

Seems reasonable... however CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR really has two
overloaded meanings (at least on i386).  First of all, as you say, it
does enable drivers to request MSI/MSI-X.  However, on i386
CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR also changes how the APIC is setup (the most
visible effect of which is different interrupt numbers).

I would propose the following course of action:

 1) Merge Long's latest MSI/MSI-X patches (updated patches in
    http://gmane.linux.kernel/218830).  Without the new semantics of
    pci_disable_msi()/pci_disable_msix(), it's very difficult to use
    MSI/MSI-X in a device driver.
 2) Split the config options so we have an i386-specific
    CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR and a generic CONFIG_PCI_MSI (with
    CONFIG_PCI_MSI depending on something like !I386 || CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR)
    This would be an updated version of your patch.
 3) Make the code in drivers/pci/msi.c less Intel-specific -- instead
    of hard-coding Intel-specific addresses for vectors have the
    computation call into arch code.  This would be a fair amount of
    work and depends documentation for non-Intel platforms that
    implement MSI/MSI-X -- should be easier as PCI Express comes out.

 - Roland

  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-26 22:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-26 22:15 [PATCH] rename CONFIG_PCI_USE_VECTOR to CONFIG_PCI_MSI Bjorn Helgaas
2004-07-26 22:39 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2004-07-26 22:45   ` Roland Dreier
2004-07-26 23:34   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2004-07-27  1:03     ` Roland Dreier
2004-07-27  5:48       ` Zwane Mwaikambo
     [not found]     ` <20040726164324.683ff471.akpm@osdl.org>
     [not found]       ` <524qnu5j8l.fsf@topspin.com>
     [not found]         ` <20040726183917.65927925.akpm@osdl.org>
     [not found]           ` <20040727023927.GB24599@kroah.com>
2004-07-28 17:08             ` [PATCH][1/2] Stop using dev->bus->ops directly in msi.c Roland Dreier
2004-07-28 17:11             ` [PATCH][2/2] MSI/MSI-X API updates Roland Dreier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52llh65r6s.fsf@topspin.com \
    --to=roland@topspin.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tom.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.