From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172] helo=ns3.lanforge.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WFU89-00020V-Ns for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:45:34 +0000 Received: from [192.168.100.236] (firewall.candelatech.com [70.89.124.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns3.lanforge.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s1HJj4A1027004 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:45:04 -0800 Message-ID: <530266C0.6000104@candelatech.com> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:45:04 -0800 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Fwd: Question on how encryption keys are supposed to be handled. References: <53026685.7040303@candelatech.com> In-Reply-To: <53026685.7040303@candelatech.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: ath10k Just in case someone has investigated similar issues.... -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Question on how encryption keys are supposed to be handled. Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:44:05 -0800 From: Ben Greear Organization: Candela Technologies To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org , hostap@lists.shmoo.com I've been debugging an issue where my ath10k firmware is running out of key objects to allocate. This could be a simple issue in the firmware, but first I wanted to try to figure out how things are supposed to work. What I see in my firmware is that near time of association it allocates 4 keys. Two of them are multicast, and one of the multicast is index 0, the second is index 1. Then, some time later (probably on rekey), another multicast is added at index 2. After that, key space is exhausted so I see errors in the kernel logs about adding broadcast keys failing. TCP and UDP traffic continues to flow, but I am not testing multicast traffic, so maybe that would be failing. So, question is: Is it expected that the mcast keys keep being added at increasing key indexes? If so, what is the maximum index allowed? Is this something primarily controlled at the supplicant level? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ HostAP mailing list HostAP@lists.shmoo.com http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/hostap _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k