From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 23:39:50 -0800 Message-ID: <53030E46.3060908@zytor.com> References: <1392669684-4807-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com> <53029167.4060109@zytor.com> <20140218073111.GW27965@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140218073111.GW27965@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Waiman Long , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt , Andrew Morton , Michel Lespinasse , Andi Kleen , Rik van Riel , "Paul E. McKenney" , Linus Torvalds , Raghavendra K T , George Spelvin , Tim Chen , Daniel J Blueman , Alexander Fyodorov , Aswin Chandramouleeswaran , Scott J Norton , Thavatchai Makphaibulchoke List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On 02/17/2014 11:31 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> >> This is starting to look good, so I have pulled it into >> tip:x86/spinlocks to start give it some testing mileage. > > It very much needs paravirt muck before we can even consider it. > Ah yes. Joy ... I so love PV. -hpa