All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
To: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>, Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 02/12] bonding: permit using arp_validate with non-ab modes
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:21:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5303424A.2020700@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1392706127-28390-3-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com>

On 02/18/2014 07:48 AM, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
> Currently it's disabled because it's sometimes hard, in typical configs, to
> make it work - because of the nature how the loadbalance modes work - as
> it's hard to deliver valid arp replies to correct slaves by the switch.
> 
> However we still can use arp_validation in loadbalance with several other
> configs, per example with arp_validate == 2 for backup with one broadcast
> domain, without the switch(es) doing any balancing - this way we'd be (a
> bit more) sure that the slave is up.
> 
> So, enable it to let users decide which one works/suits them best. Also
> correct the mode limitation from BOND_OPT_ARP_VALIDATE.
> 
> CC: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
> CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-18 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-18  6:48 (unknown), Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-18  6:48 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 01/12] bonding: remove bond->lock from bond_arp_rcv Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-18 11:54   ` Ding Tianhong
2014-02-18  6:48 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 02/12] bonding: permit using arp_validate with non-ab modes Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-18 11:21   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov [this message]
2014-02-18  6:48 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 03/12] bonding: always update last_arp_rx on packet recieve Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-18  6:48 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 04/12] bonding: always set recv_probe to bond_arp_rcv in arp monitor Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-18  6:48 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 05/12] bonding: extend arp_validate to be able to receive unvalidated arp-only traffic Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-18  6:48 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 06/12] bonding: document the new _arp options for arp_validate Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-18  6:48 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 07/12] bonding: use the new options to correctly set last_arp_rx Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-18  6:48 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 08/12] bonding: use last_arp_rx in slave_last_rx() Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-18  6:48 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 09/12] bonding: use last_arp_rx in bond_loadbalance_arp_mon() Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-18  6:48 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 10/12] bonding: remove useless updating of slave->dev->last_rx Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-18  6:48 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 11/12] bonding: trivial: rename slave->jiffies to ->last_link_up Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-18  6:48 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 12/12] bonding: rename last_arp_rx to last_rx Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-18  6:58 ` [PATCH v5 net-next 0/12] bonding: add an option to rely on unvalidated arp packets Veaceslav Falico
2014-02-18 21:49 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5303424A.2020700@redhat.com \
    --to=nikolay@redhat.com \
    --cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
    --cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vfalico@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.