All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Behan Webster <behanw@converseincode.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	"Michal Marek" <mmarek@suse.cz>,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, "Jan-Simon Möller" <dl9pf@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:12:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53044B35.3010203@converseincode.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140219060717.GA25806@ravnborg.org>

On 02/18/14 22:07, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>>>> The LLVMLinux project is working on changes to the LLVM/clang toolchain
>>>> as well as to the linux kernel code in order to be able to compile the
>>>> kernel with clang.
>>> I have no objection to this, but would like to see more of these patches
>>> reviewed by (among others) the kbuild guys (cc'd).  I also could not find
>>> some of these patches published on lkml (where I would expect to see
>>> them).  And the top patch has a very uninformative commit message :-(
>> Of course. That is the intention. I'll review all the commit
>> messages as well.
> Please send the patches as least to linux-kbuild for review.
> I almost never go hunting for patches in a git repo for review,
> and this is the same for others.
Yes. The plan is to send them to the list. Just haven't got to it yet. 
Sorry for the confusion.

Like I said, at this point I was just asking about linux-next inclusion, 
and how that all worked.

Behan

-- 
Behan Webster
behanw@converseincode.com


  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-19  6:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <5303C695.4030403@converseincode.com>
2014-02-19  0:17 ` linux-next Stephen Rothwell
2014-02-19  2:17   ` linux-next Behan Webster
2014-02-19  6:07     ` linux-next Sam Ravnborg
2014-02-19  6:12       ` Behan Webster [this message]
2014-02-19  6:22         ` linux-next Stephen Rothwell
2014-02-19 18:06           ` linux-next Behan Webster
2014-02-20  0:03             ` linux-next Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53044B35.3010203@converseincode.com \
    --to=behanw@converseincode.com \
    --cc=dl9pf@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.