From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nouveau, ACPI: fix regression caused by b072e53
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 22:12:09 +0800
Message-ID: <5304BBB9.9010205@linux.intel.com>
References: <1392785628-30633-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> <5304838B.4040500@canonical.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <5304838B.4040500@canonical.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>, Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org



On 2014/2/19 18:12, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> op 19-02-14 05:53, Jiang Liu schreef:
>> On some platforms, ACPI _DSM method (nouveau_op_dsm_muid, function 0)
>> has special requirements on the fourth parameter, which is different
>> from ACPI specifications. So revert to the private implementation
>> to check availability of _DSM functions instead of using common
>> acpi_check_dsm() interface.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> Hi Maarten,
>>     Thanks for bisecting. Could you please help to verify whether
>> this patch fixes the regression?
>>
> Tested-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
> 
> I was wrong about the operator precedence, seems correct after all. :-)
Hi Maarten,
	Thanks for testing.
Cheers!
Gerry