From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com,
tim@xen.org, patches@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 6/6] xen/arm: Replace early_printk call to printk call
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:37:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5305E8F9.1020704@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1392895205.23342.28.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
On 20/02/14 11:20, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 11:14 +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
>>
>> On 20/02/14 11:05, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 11:01 +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 20/02/14 09:04, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>>>> I was actually thinking more along the lines of a .word at a defined
>>>>> offset which you could hex edit to a specific value to activate a
>>>>> particular flavour of early printk handling. That would be sufficient
>>>>> e.g. for osstest to activate the appropriate stuff for the specific
>>>>> platform.
>>>>
>>>> I don't see useful use case to have a such early printk implementation
>>>> in Xen. When the board is fully supported, failed at early stage (e.g
>>>> before console is initialized) is very unlikely. At least if you don't
>>>> play with memory.
>>>
>>> a) there are boards which aren't fully supported, getting some debug out
>>> of a distro package might be useful
>>
>> Few months ago we have decided to allow early printk only when Xen is
>> compiled with debug enabled. It seems a big mistake to ship distro with
>> debug enabled :).
>
> This was because earlyprintk only supports a static single configuration
> at compile time. If that restriction was lifted then there would be no
> reason to limit earlyprintk to debug builds.
>
>>> b) even for boards which are fully supported there may still be bugs
>>> which only appear under particular circumstances.
>>
>> I understand this use case. If I understand your previous mail the
>> solution would me "Hex editing manually the Xen binary to set the early
>> printk", right? If so, you are assuming that the distro (or anything
>> else) is proving the zImage. Otherwise the developper has to:
>> - unpack from the uImage
>> - editing the zImage
>> - recreate the uImage
>
> No distro would ship the actual uImage, it's too machine specific.
>
> I would expect this to be used by running:
> xen-enable-early-printk /boot/xen midway
>
> where xen-enable-early-printk is a simple tool we provide.
And a similar one to disable, I guess.
>
> Then if a uIamge is then required then this would be generated by
> whatever distro tooling would have generated it in the non-early-printk
> case, by rerunning that tool.
Sounds good. Do you plan to work on it?
It would be nice to have this item on the ARM todo page.
--
Julien Grall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-20 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-05 21:26 [RFC 0/6] xen/arm: Merge early_printk function in console code Julien Grall
2014-01-05 21:26 ` [RFC 1/6] xen/arm: earlyprintk: move early_flush in early_puts Julien Grall
2014-02-19 11:13 ` Ian Campbell
2014-01-05 21:26 ` [RFC 2/6] xen/arm: earlyprintk: export early_puts Julien Grall
2014-02-19 11:14 ` Ian Campbell
2014-01-05 21:26 ` [RFC 3/6] xen/arm: Rename EARLY_PRINTK compile option to CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK Julien Grall
2014-02-19 11:16 ` Ian Campbell
2014-01-05 21:26 ` [RFC 4/6] xen/console: Add support for early printk Julien Grall
2014-02-19 11:19 ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-20 16:38 ` Julien Grall
2014-01-05 21:26 ` [RFC 5/6] xen/console: Add noreturn attribute to panic function Julien Grall
2014-01-05 22:44 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-01-06 11:39 ` Julien Grall
2014-01-06 11:42 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-01-06 11:46 ` Julien Grall
2014-01-05 21:26 ` [RFC 6/6] xen/arm: Replace early_printk call to printk call Julien Grall
2014-02-19 11:20 ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-19 17:56 ` Julien Grall
2014-02-20 9:04 ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-20 11:01 ` Julien Grall
2014-02-20 11:05 ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-20 11:14 ` Julien Grall
2014-02-20 11:20 ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-20 11:37 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2014-02-20 13:02 ` Ian Campbell
2014-02-19 12:33 ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-05 7:53 ` Julien Grall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5305E8F9.1020704@linaro.org \
--to=julien.grall@linaro.org \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.