From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Release, RC5, and branching
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 14:03:10 +0000
Message-ID: <53075C9E.9070608@eu.citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

So it's now been several days, and no one has reported any major issues 
with RC4.  There are a handful of ARM-related fixes in the tree.

I propose that we tag RC5 today, and make that the official release 
(whenever we're ready to with the Linux Foundation PR process).

After tagging RC5 this afternoon, I don't see much reason not to branch 
-- I don't think at this point we're going to get much more testing in.

Thoughts?

  -George