From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sylwester Nawrocki Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] phy: Select PHY_EXYNOS_DP_VIDEO by default for ARCH_EXYNOS Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:50:44 +0100 Message-ID: <530783E4.6090206@samsung.com> References: <1392997802-29050-1-git-send-email-s.nawrocki@samsung.com> <1753680.KKj0Q1erxA@wuerfel> <53077DE0.7080108@samsung.com> <1888663.ccFYmJ9QJl@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout1.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.11]:18360 "EHLO mailout1.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932141AbaBUQuv (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:50:51 -0500 In-reply-to: <1888663.ccFYmJ9QJl@wuerfel> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kishon@ti.com, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, jg1.han@samsung.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 21/02/14 17:41, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 21 February 2014 17:25:04 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: >> > >> > Hmm, good point, I will modify it that way. >> > >> > For patch 1/2 I guess it should be: >> > >> > "default ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS" >> > >> > or rather >> > >> > "default y if ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS" ? > > Right. I'd probably use the first syntax, but it doesn't really matter. Oops, I've already sent patch using the second one, as it seemed more common. Thanks, Sylwester From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: s.nawrocki@samsung.com (Sylwester Nawrocki) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:50:44 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] phy: Select PHY_EXYNOS_DP_VIDEO by default for ARCH_EXYNOS In-Reply-To: <1888663.ccFYmJ9QJl@wuerfel> References: <1392997802-29050-1-git-send-email-s.nawrocki@samsung.com> <1753680.KKj0Q1erxA@wuerfel> <53077DE0.7080108@samsung.com> <1888663.ccFYmJ9QJl@wuerfel> Message-ID: <530783E4.6090206@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 21/02/14 17:41, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 21 February 2014 17:25:04 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: >> > >> > Hmm, good point, I will modify it that way. >> > >> > For patch 1/2 I guess it should be: >> > >> > "default ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS" >> > >> > or rather >> > >> > "default y if ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS" ? > > Right. I'd probably use the first syntax, but it doesn't really matter. Oops, I've already sent patch using the second one, as it seemed more common. Thanks, Sylwester