From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: Add regulator entries to Exynos5420 SMDK board Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:18:48 +0900 Message-ID: <530A8FE8.4020903@samsung.com> References: <1386236664-27763-1-git-send-email-sachin.kamat@linaro.org> <6615089.743e1d93MS@amdc1227> <1604811.B6Si6qrpKm@flatron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com ([209.85.220.54]:39330 "EHLO mail-pa0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750976AbaBXAS5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:18:57 -0500 Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id fa1so5785513pad.27 for ; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 16:18:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Sachin Kamat Cc: Kukjin Kim , linux-samsung-soc , Kukjin Kim On 01/03/14 19:07, Sachin Kamat wrote: > On 21 December 2013 02:40, Tomasz Figa wrote: >> On Thursday 19 of December 2013 10:05:52 Sachin Kamat wrote: >>> Hi Tomasz, >>> >>> On 18 December 2013 20:46, Tomasz Figa wrote: >>>> Hi Sachin, >>>> >>>> On Thursday 05 of December 2013 15:14:24 Sachin Kamat wrote: >>>>> Added regulator entries to Exynos5420 SMDK board. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat >>>>> --- >>>>> Changes since v1: >>>>> Changed node name >>>>> --- >>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts | 216 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 216 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts >>>>> index fb5a1e25c632..62e1ebe4e989 100644 >>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts >>>>> @@ -120,4 +120,220 @@ >>>>> reg =<0x50>; >>>>> }; >>>>> }; >>>>> + >>>>> + hsi2c_4: i2c@12CA0000 { >>>>> + status = "okay"; >>>>> + >>>>> + s2mps11_pmic@66 { >>>> >>>> Just pmic@66 is enough. >>> >>> Please see my comment below. >>> >>>> >>>>> + compatible = "samsung,s2mps11-pmic"; >>>>> + reg =<0x66>; >>>>> + s2mps11,buck2-ramp-delay =<12>; >>>>> + s2mps11,buck34-ramp-delay =<12>; >>>>> + s2mps11,buck16-ramp-delay =<12>; >>>>> + s2mps11,buck6-ramp-enable =<1>; >>>>> + s2mps11,buck2-ramp-enable =<1>; >>>>> + s2mps11,buck3-ramp-enable =<1>; >>>>> + s2mps11,buck4-ramp-enable =<1>; >>>>> + >>>>> + s2mps11_osc: clocks { >>>>> + #clock-cells =<1>; >>>>> + clock-output-names = "s2mps11_ap", >>>>> + "s2mps11_cp", "s2mps11_bt"; >>>>> + }; >>>>> + >>>>> + regulators { >>>>> + ldo1_reg: LDO1 { >>>>> + regulator-name = "vdd_ldo1"; >>>> >>>> Is this the name as written on the PCB or board schematics? >>>> + the same for all regulators below. >>> >>> Yes, the schematic refers to these just as above (with no specific names). >>> Unless you have strong objections or a re-spin of this patch becomes >>> necessary, I >>> wouldn't want to change the name you pointed above. :) >> >> OK. >> >> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa > > Ping Kukjin. > Applied, thanks. - Kukjin