All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Naresh Kumar Kachhi <naresh.kumar.kachhi@intel.com>
To: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/6] drm/i915: introduce runtime get/put based on display activity
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:51:32 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <530AD6DC.6060607@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+gsUGQzxv1HUS3fTJvJRzdQV5PDELDmi3UfnwUpz9Yn=dXzMg@mail.gmail.com>

On 01/22/2014 07:10 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Hi
>
> 2014/1/22  <naresh.kumar.kachhi@intel.com>:
>> From: Naresh Kumar Kachhi <naresh.kumar.kachhi@intel.com>
>>
>> Once the display is disabled, we need to call runtime_put to
>> make sure Runtime framework triggers runtime_suspend based on
>> idleness. Similarly when display gets enabled, runtime_get should
>> be called. We have similiar function for pc8 feature, but some
>> platform(BYT) might not have pc8 feature, so creating a generic
>> function for runtime_pm
> Does this patch series help you somehow?
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2013-December/037721.html

Yes, this patch series helps here. Do we know when these patches will
bemerged to nightly build?

>> Signed-off-by: Naresh Kumar Kachhi <naresh.kumar.kachhi@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h  |  2 ++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h |  1 +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c  | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> index d1399f9..6a6f046 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> @@ -1325,6 +1325,8 @@ struct i915_package_c8 {
>>   struct i915_runtime_pm {
>>          bool suspended;
>>          bool gpu_idle;
>> +       bool disp_idle;
>> +       struct mutex lock;
>>   };
>>
>>   enum intel_pipe_crc_source {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> index 9061aa7..94a6127 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> @@ -887,6 +887,7 @@ void intel_init_runtime_pm(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>   void intel_fini_runtime_pm(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>   void intel_runtime_pm_gpu_busy(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>   void intel_runtime_pm_gpu_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> +void intel_runtime_update_disp_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>>   void ilk_wm_get_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev);
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> index 991ff62..9d6d0e1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> @@ -5501,6 +5501,54 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_gpu_busy(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>          }
>>   }
>>
>> +static void intel_runtime_pm_disp_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> +{
>> +       if (!HAS_RUNTIME_PM(dev_priv->dev))
>> +               return;
>> +
>> +       mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pm.lock);
>> +       if (!dev_priv->pm.disp_idle) {
>> +               dev_priv->pm.disp_idle = true;
>> +               intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
>> +       }
>> +       mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->pm.lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void intel_runtime_pm_disp_busy(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> +{
>> +       if (!HAS_RUNTIME_PM(dev_priv->dev))
>> +               return;
>> +
>> +       mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pm.lock);
>> +       if (dev_priv->pm.disp_idle) {
>> +               dev_priv->pm.disp_idle = false;
>> +               /* This call is coming from an IOCTL so we have already done a
>> +                * get_sync. get_noresume should suffice here
>> +                */
>> +               intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume(dev_priv);
>> +       }
>> +       mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->pm.lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void intel_runtime_update_disp_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> +{
>> +       struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
>> +       struct intel_crtc *crtc;
>> +       bool enabled = false;
>> +
>> +       if (!HAS_RUNTIME_PM(dev_priv->dev))
>> +               return;
>> +
>> +       list_for_each_entry(crtc, &dev->mode_config.crtc_list, base.head)
>> +               enabled |= crtc->base.enabled;
>> +
>> +       if (enabled)
>> +               intel_runtime_pm_disp_busy(dev_priv);
>> +       else
>> +               intel_runtime_pm_disp_idle(dev_priv);
>> +
>> +}
>> +
>>   void intel_runtime_pm_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>   {
>>          struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
>> @@ -5547,6 +5595,8 @@ void intel_init_runtime_pm(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>
>>          dev_priv->pm.suspended = false;
>>          dev_priv->pm.gpu_idle = true;
>> +       dev_priv->pm.disp_idle = true;
>> +       mutex_init(&dev_priv->pm.lock);
>>
>>          if (!HAS_RUNTIME_PM(dev))
>>                  return;
>> --
>> 1.8.1.2
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-24  5:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-22 12:04 [RFC 0/6] enabling runtime on BYT naresh.kumar.kachhi
2014-01-22 12:04 ` [RFC 1/6] drm/i915: cover ioctls with runtime_get/put naresh.kumar.kachhi
2014-01-22 12:51   ` Daniel Vetter
2014-01-22 13:23     ` Imre Deak
2014-01-24 15:05       ` Naresh Kumar Kachhi
2014-01-24 15:56         ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-02-24  5:17           ` Naresh Kumar Kachhi
2014-01-24 17:23         ` Imre Deak
2014-02-21 20:07           ` Jesse Barnes
2014-02-24  5:30             ` Naresh Kumar Kachhi
2014-01-22 13:35   ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-01-22 12:04 ` [RFC 2/6] drm/i915: cover ring access with rpm get/put naresh.kumar.kachhi
2014-01-22 13:39   ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-01-22 12:04 ` [RFC 3/6] drm/i915: introduce runtime get/put based on display activity naresh.kumar.kachhi
2014-01-22 13:40   ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-02-24  5:21     ` Naresh Kumar Kachhi [this message]
2014-01-22 12:04 ` [RFC 4/6] drm/i915/vlv: call runtime get/put based on disp activity naresh.kumar.kachhi
2014-01-22 12:04 ` [RFC 5/6] drm/i915: device specific runtime suspend/resume naresh.kumar.kachhi
2014-01-22 12:58   ` Daniel Vetter
2014-01-24 15:23     ` Naresh Kumar Kachhi
2014-01-22 12:04 ` [RFC 6/6] FOR_UPSTREAM [VPG]: drm/i915: call init_runtime_pm before gem_init naresh.kumar.kachhi
2014-01-22 13:44   ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-01-24 15:11     ` Naresh Kumar Kachhi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=530AD6DC.6060607@intel.com \
    --to=naresh.kumar.kachhi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=przanoni@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.