diff for duplicates of <530AED41.4060407@linaro.org> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 6fc66d2..fe67394 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -20,19 +20,19 @@ On 2014-2-22 18:33, Catalin Marinas wrote: >> >> OK, I'll drop [3/5] for now, then. > -> Thanks (it’s only temporary ;)). +> Thanks (it?s only temporary ;)). > >> I'm wondering, though, whose ACKs I should be waiting for before applying those >> patches? > > Good question ;). In this particular case, there is an ongoing -> discussion between Hanjun and Sudeep. While there isn’t anything +> discussion between Hanjun and Sudeep. While there isn?t anything > major, I would like to see some agreement and potentially an Ack from > the other party involved in the discussion (Sudeep). > -> There are other patches that are not specific to ARM, so it’s -> really your decision. As for the general ARM(64) ACPI case, I don’t -> think we have anyone in charge with deciding what’s correct or not +> There are other patches that are not specific to ARM, so it?s +> really your decision. As for the general ARM(64) ACPI case, I don?t +> think we have anyone in charge with deciding what?s correct or not > (BTW, who are the people active both in the _ARM_ Linux kernel community > and the ACPI standardisation forum?). @@ -41,7 +41,3 @@ I'm in ASWG (ACPI spec working group) under UEFI, and Al Stone and Charles Thanks Hanjun --- -To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in -the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org -More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 490e899..4276825 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -3,20 +3,10 @@ "ref\020140221182424.GA5751@arm.com\0" "ref\01408521.4TEdKhuRp5@vostro.rjw.lan\0" "ref\0F980FA86-6705-4A71-956C-EA2DBD787199@arm.com\0" - "From\0Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] ACPI / processor_core: Rework _PDC related stuff to make it more arch-independent\0" + "From\0hanjun.guo@linaro.org (Hanjun Guo)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH v5 2/5] ACPI / processor_core: Rework _PDC related stuff to make it more arch-independent\0" "Date\0Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:57:05 +0800\0" - "To\0Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>" - " Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>\0" - "Cc\0Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>" - graeme.gregory@linaro.org <graeme.gregory@linaro.org> - patches@linaro.org <patches@linaro.org> - linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org> - linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> - linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org> - Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> - " Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com>\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 2014-2-22 18:33, Catalin Marinas wrote:\n" @@ -41,19 +31,19 @@ ">>\n" ">> OK, I'll drop [3/5] for now, then.\n" "> \n" - "> Thanks (it\342\200\231s only temporary ;)).\n" + "> Thanks (it?s only temporary ;)).\n" "> \n" ">> I'm wondering, though, whose ACKs I should be waiting for before applying those\n" ">> patches?\n" "> \n" "> Good question ;). In this particular case, there is an ongoing\n" - "> discussion between Hanjun and Sudeep. While there isn\342\200\231t anything\n" + "> discussion between Hanjun and Sudeep. While there isn?t anything\n" "> major, I would like to see some agreement and potentially an Ack from\n" "> the other party involved in the discussion (Sudeep).\n" "> \n" - "> There are other patches that are not specific to ARM, so it\342\200\231s\n" - "> really your decision. As for the general ARM(64) ACPI case, I don\342\200\231t\n" - "> think we have anyone in charge with deciding what\342\200\231s correct or not\n" + "> There are other patches that are not specific to ARM, so it?s\n" + "> really your decision. As for the general ARM(64) ACPI case, I don?t\n" + "> think we have anyone in charge with deciding what?s correct or not\n" "> (BTW, who are the people active both in the _ARM_ Linux kernel community\n" "> and the ACPI standardisation forum?).\n" "\n" @@ -61,10 +51,6 @@ "(+cc Charles) are also in this forum.\n" "\n" "Thanks\n" - "Hanjun\n" - "--\n" - "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-acpi\" in\n" - "the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org\n" - More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html + Hanjun -d57ab4da547abe3b0b5a6f5e3b56e6eb88d8d3053f326edaeb5482ddf40ae594 +407361b7a03900b9a142fca02094511524cc0459829e3df2675c1b4ccfa59625
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index 6fc66d2..78301bf 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -41,7 +41,3 @@ I'm in ASWG (ACPI spec working group) under UEFI, and Al Stone and Charles Thanks Hanjun --- -To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in -the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org -More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 490e899..f869923 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -61,10 +61,6 @@ "(+cc Charles) are also in this forum.\n" "\n" "Thanks\n" - "Hanjun\n" - "--\n" - "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-acpi\" in\n" - "the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org\n" - More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html + Hanjun -d57ab4da547abe3b0b5a6f5e3b56e6eb88d8d3053f326edaeb5482ddf40ae594 +774b415b334227c6ba304e453ad7336abbd7c38c04182fc47a0a2775130be354
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.