From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172] helo=ns3.lanforge.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WHyVk-0002ty-A7 for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:36:10 +0000 Message-ID: <530B74E1.8040908@candelatech.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 08:35:45 -0800 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Anyone have luck with WLE900VX? References: <5307F7D3.1030703@candelatech.com> <87fvn8trh2.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: <87fvn8trh2.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Kalle Valo Cc: ath10k On 02/24/2014 08:17 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: > Ben Greear writes: > >> I managed to get a few WLE900VX, and I've seen some funny things so far. > > Do you have any more info what type of board it is? Is it CUS223, XBNNN > (N being a decimal) or something else? http://www.compex.com.sg/Datasheets/WLE900VX_Dsv1.0.0.pdf I was told the ref design, but cannot remember it..will ask again. It is not a high power design like the CUS223, evidently. > What's the chip id? 05:00.0 Network controller: Atheros Communications Inc. Device 003c Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 18 Memory at f4400000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=2M] Expansion ROM at f4600000 [disabled] [size=64K] Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2 Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable- Count=1/8 Maskable+ 64bit- Capabilities: [70] Express Endpoint, MSI 00 Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting Capabilities: [140] Virtual Channel Capabilities: [160] Device Serial Number 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 Kernel driver in use: ath10k_pci >> First, with the official firmware 10.1.467.1-1 it immediately crashes on startup. >> I don't have that firmware source, so I don't know why it crashes. >> I wasn't even trying to create more than the default wlanX station. > > Is that with stock ath10k driver or does ath10k contain any custom > changes? It had custom changes, and at least one patch that might cause trouble: The one that doubled the number of key cache entries that I posted a few days ago. I can try with all that backed out. >> With my firmware (based on 10.1.389), it boots up OK and I can create >> and associate 32 station vifs. >> >> Both NICs that I have tried so far report the same mostly bogus >> MAC: 00:03:07:12:34:56 >> >> The NIC's spec sheet claims it is 3x3, but 'iw phy phyX info' shows only >> 2 streams supported for both the 2.4Ghz n band and the 5Ghz /ac band. > > Hmm, I wonder if otp.bin fails. Can you check what result code you get > from otp.bin? Add something like this to ath10k_download_and_run_otp(): > > ret = ath10k_bmi_execute(ar, address, &exec_param); > ath10k_dbg(ATH10K_DBG_BOOT, "boot otp execute result %d\n", exec_param); Will do, thanks! Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k