From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [sched/balance] 7511dd0a7: +2.1e+05% context switches
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:10:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <530C0996.3070405@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140225013314.GA8148@localhost>
On 02/25/2014 09:33 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 03:21:29PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>> On 02/19/2014 09:00 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>>> bc575710efe937e 7511dd0a73aaf2ca4bcd829f9
>>> --------------- -------------------------
>>> 2029 ~ 0% +222.9% 6551 ~17% lkp-snb01/micro/will-it-scale/pthread_mutex2
>>> 143678 ~42% +4.8e+05% 6.927e+08 ~ 0% lkp-snb01/micro/will-it-scale/sched_yield
>>> 145708 ~42% +4.8e+05% 6.927e+08 ~ 0% TOTAL time.involuntary_context_switches
>>
>>
>> Thanks for testing, Fengguang!
>>
>> Does the context switch increasing happen on whole patchset? or just
>> happens on this patch?
>
> Only this patch. Some other patches actually reduce the context switches.
> This is all the changes for branch alexshi/topdown:
Thanks a lot for great testing!
Would you like sharing the every benchmarks run on each of testing
machine, then we not only know the benchmark change on the machine, but
also know what benchmark was not effected on the machine?
And it will be perfect if you like to give a URL for benchmarks which
you are using. :)
>
> v3.14-rc2 d2f8e017fdd913fc150160508
> --------------- -------------------------
> 111372 ~ 1% +60.1% 178267 ~ 1% lkp-ws02/micro/hackbench/1600%-threads-pipe
> 111372 ~ 1% +60.1% 178267 ~ 1% TOTAL hackbench.throughput
>
> v3.14-rc2 d2f8e017fdd913fc150160508
> --------------- -------------------------
> 11862017 ~10% +769.1% 1.031e+08 ~ 9% lkp-ws02/micro/hackbench/1600%-threads-pipe
> 11862017 ~10% +769.1% 1.031e+08 ~ 9% TOTAL numa-numastat.node0.numa_hit
>
> v3.14-rc2 d2f8e017fdd913fc150160508
> --------------- -------------------------
> 11862016 ~10% +769.1% 1.031e+08 ~ 9% lkp-ws02/micro/hackbench/1600%-threads-pipe
> 11862016 ~10% +769.1% 1.031e+08 ~ 9% TOTAL numa-numastat.node0.local_node
>
> v3.14-rc2 d2f8e017fdd913fc150160508
> --------------- -------------------------
> 4629280 ~ 9% +714.0% 37683303 ~ 9% lkp-ws02/micro/hackbench/1600%-threads-pipe
> 4629280 ~ 9% +714.0% 37683303 ~ 9% TOTAL proc-vmstat.pgalloc_dma32
>
> v3.14-rc2 d2f8e017fdd913fc150160508
> --------------- -------------------------
> 6476588 ~11% +751.1% 55123483 ~ 7% lkp-ws02/micro/hackbench/1600%-threads-pipe
> 6476588 ~11% +751.1% 55123483 ~ 7% TOTAL numa-vmstat.node0.numa_hit
>
> v3.14-rc2 d2f8e017fdd913fc150160508
> --------------- -------------------------
> 6380486 ~11% +761.9% 54995307 ~ 7% lkp-ws02/micro/hackbench/1600%-threads-pipe
> 6380486 ~11% +761.9% 54995307 ~ 7% TOTAL numa-vmstat.node0.numa_local
>
> v3.14-rc2 d2f8e017fdd913fc150160508
> --------------- -------------------------
> 24214 ~ 1% -71.8% 6824 ~ 7% lkp-a03/micro/will-it-scale/sched_yield
> 55173 ~ 0% -76.9% 12720 ~ 0% lkp-snb01/micro/will-it-scale/pthread_mutex2
> 55292 ~ 0% -78.9% 11653 ~ 3% lkp-snb01/micro/will-it-scale/sched_yield
> 134680 ~ 0% -76.8% 31198 ~ 3% TOTAL interrupts.RES
>
> v3.14-rc2 d2f8e017fdd913fc150160508
> --------------- -------------------------
> 25891 ~ 1% +99.5% 51664 ~ 0% lkp-a03/micro/will-it-scale/sched_yield
> 25891 ~ 1% +99.5% 51664 ~ 0% TOTAL softirqs.SCHED
>
> v3.14-rc2 d2f8e017fdd913fc150160508
> --------------- -------------------------
> 4282244 ~ 1% -46.6% 2284599 ~ 8% lkp-ws02/micro/hackbench/1600%-threads-pipe
> 4282244 ~ 1% -46.6% 2284599 ~ 8% TOTAL proc-vmstat.pgfault
>
> v3.14-rc2 d2f8e017fdd913fc150160508
> --------------- -------------------------
> 105276 ~ 0% -43.3% 59659 ~ 0% lkp-snb01/micro/will-it-scale/pthread_mutex2
> 105799 ~ 1% -38.0% 65577 ~ 1% lkp-snb01/micro/will-it-scale/sched_yield
> 211075 ~ 0% -40.7% 125236 ~ 0% TOTAL cpuidle.C7-SNB.usage
>
> v3.14-rc2 d2f8e017fdd913fc150160508
> --------------- -------------------------
> 4.174e+08 ~ 0% +31.2% 5.478e+08 ~ 0% lkp-a03/micro/will-it-scale/sched_yield
> 4.174e+08 ~ 0% +31.2% 5.478e+08 ~ 0% TOTAL cpuidle.C4.time
>
> v3.14-rc2 d2f8e017fdd913fc150160508
> --------------- -------------------------
> 20.64 ~ 0% +23.9% 25.57 ~ 0% lkp-snb01/micro/will-it-scale/sched_yield
> 20.64 ~ 0% +23.9% 25.57 ~ 0% TOTAL turbostat.%c1
>
> v3.14-rc2 d2f8e017fdd913fc150160508
> --------------- -------------------------
> 214235 ~ 0% -13.4% 185581 ~ 0% lkp-a03/micro/will-it-scale/sched_yield
> 214235 ~ 0% -13.4% 185581 ~ 0% TOTAL interrupts.LOC
>
> v3.14-rc2 d2f8e017fdd913fc150160508
> --------------- -------------------------
> 133373 ~ 0% -10.8% 119020 ~ 0% lkp-a03/micro/will-it-scale/sched_yield
> 133373 ~ 0% -10.8% 119020 ~ 0% TOTAL softirqs.TIMER
>
> v3.14-rc2 d2f8e017fdd913fc150160508
> --------------- -------------------------
> 1109 ~ 8% +9292.8% 104250 ~ 1% lkp-a03/micro/will-it-scale/sched_yield
> 4060 ~38% +1.2e+05% 4868923 ~ 2% lkp-snb01/micro/will-it-scale/sched_yield
> 5169 ~32% +96094.8% 4973173 ~ 2% TOTAL vmstat.system.cs
>
> v3.14-rc2 d2f8e017fdd913fc150160508
> --------------- -------------------------
> 2045 ~ 1% +221.7% 6578 ~ 2% lkp-snb01/micro/will-it-scale/pthread_mutex2
> 2045 ~ 1% +221.7% 6578 ~ 2% TOTAL time.involuntary_context_switches
>
> v3.14-rc2 d2f8e017fdd913fc150160508
> --------------- -------------------------
> 800 ~ 0% -18.8% 650 ~ 0% lkp-a03/micro/will-it-scale/sched_yield
> 800 ~ 0% -18.8% 650 ~ 0% TOTAL vmstat.system.in
>
> v3.14-rc2 d2f8e017fdd913fc150160508
> --------------- -------------------------
> 50.56 ~ 0% -1.8% 49.64 ~ 0% lkp-snb01/micro/will-it-scale/pthread_mutex2
> 50.55 ~ 0% -9.4% 45.80 ~ 0% lkp-snb01/micro/will-it-scale/sched_yield
> 101.11 ~ 0% -5.6% 95.44 ~ 0% TOTAL turbostat.%c0
>
> v3.14-rc2 d2f8e017fdd913fc150160508
> --------------- -------------------------
> 1518 ~ 0% -4.9% 1443 ~ 0% lkp-snb01/micro/will-it-scale/pthread_mutex2
> 1518 ~ 0% -4.9% 1443 ~ 0% TOTAL time.user_time
>
> v3.14-rc2 d2f8e017fdd913fc150160508
> --------------- -------------------------
> 488 ~ 0% -4.8% 465 ~ 0% lkp-snb01/micro/will-it-scale/pthread_mutex2
> 488 ~ 0% -4.8% 465 ~ 0% TOTAL time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
>
> Thanks,
> Fengguang
>
--
Thanks
Alex
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-25 3:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-19 13:00 [sched/balance] 7511dd0a7: +2.1e+05% context switches Fengguang Wu
2014-02-20 7:21 ` Alex Shi
2014-02-25 1:33 ` Fengguang Wu
2014-02-25 3:10 ` Alex Shi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=530C0996.3070405@linaro.org \
--to=alex.shi@linaro.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.