From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: ceph-standalone Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:33:35 +0100 Message-ID: <530C555F.1030902@dachary.org> References: <22A49EE2-BD1A-43C2-BBAB-8DD18CBEA550@inktank.com> <187667BD-58E9-4E75-8A71-872C3EB88095@inktank.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="d6WquxgsmiDTQejU9bKwlmmBsKfDAJw2K" Return-path: Received: from smtp.dmail.dachary.org ([91.121.254.229]:53255 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752181AbaBYIdi (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 03:33:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ricardo Rocha Cc: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" , Robert Sander , Stephan Seitz This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --d6WquxgsmiDTQejU9bKwlmmBsKfDAJw2K Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 25/02/2014 04:34, Ricardo Rocha wrote: > I did it mostly to learn about docker (and because i wanted a 'cluster > in the office' like Loic had :-)). Not incredibly pretty though. :-) Robert and Stephan created this nice office cluster and it would be n= ice to know how it evolved. My understanding is that it was an experiment= to learn about Ceph before doing something more ambitious. Cheers > Usually i go with vagrant to deploy ceph in a box (1 mon, 2 osds) in > an lxc container, with file loopback mounts and using the puppet > module to deploy/config (which has good vagrant integration, and > mimics our production env). We use a similar setup for the openstack > bits, and it's also the basis of our continuous integration. >=20 > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Hunter Nield wrote: >> The packer solution sounds sensible to me as it also would allow the >> creation of Docker images. >> >> A basic Docker image has already been started >> (https://index.docker.io/u/rochaporto/cephbox/) but it would be quite >> useful to have a version that comes from an official maintained >> source. >> >> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Kyle Bader wro= te: >>>> so that's great. It's already almost done. Let us know when you have= managed updating it. >>>> >>>> I suppose it would be best if we could offer one image each of the l= ast 3 Ceph versions (dumpling, emperor and firefly) so people can then pl= ay with the expected level they are looking for in either test environmen= t or production environment. >>>> >>>> Each of the images would be maintained up to date for the last stabl= e code base of each version only to reduce time consuming. >>> >>> This is screaming for us to use packer [1], that way we can easily >>> create vbox/kvm/ec2 images from a file that we can stash in git >>> >>> [1] http://www.packer.io/ >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel"= in >>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" = in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >=20 --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --d6WquxgsmiDTQejU9bKwlmmBsKfDAJw2K Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlMMVWAACgkQ8dLMyEl6F20iMACfe3KHu1nx40ZyX8qtLPk9TU2e E40AnipEYNv6kjum32v1SafvNUE2Tk3M =eByX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d6WquxgsmiDTQejU9bKwlmmBsKfDAJw2K--