From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
behanw@converseincode.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
x86@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
oleg@redhat.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: LLVMLinux: Reimplement current_stack_pointer without register usage.
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:03:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <530D5989.5060001@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <530D58CD.4080202@mit.edu>
On 02/25/2014 07:00 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> How much does this actually affect the output? I only see three uses of
>> current_stack_pointer:
>>
>> /* how to get the thread information struct from C */
>> static inline struct thread_info *current_thread_info(void)
>> {
>> return (struct thread_info *)
>> (current_stack_pointer & ~(THREAD_SIZE - 1));
>> }
>>
>> ... here we need the mov anyway, because we have to then AND it with a
>> mask, which we obviously can't do inside the stack pointer.
>
> No clue what code is actually generated, but the new code could generate:
>
> mov $MASK, %rax;
> and %esp, %rax;
>
> Admittedly, I can't see any reason why this would be an improvement.
>
You have to generate one of the code sequences:
mov $MASK, %eax
and %esp, %eax
... or ...
mov %esp, %eax
and $MASK, %eax
No real difference either way.
-hpa
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-26 3:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-21 4:44 [PATCH] x86: LLVMLinux: Reimplement current_stack_pointer without register usage behanw
2014-02-21 4:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-26 3:00 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-02-26 3:03 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=530D5989.5060001@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=behanw@converseincode.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.