From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>,
Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>,
Chegu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] qspinlock: a 4-byte queue spinlock with PV support
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 13:25:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <530F82FD.1060000@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140227083715.GY9987@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 02/27/2014 03:37 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Is this the same 8 patches you send yesterday?
Sorry for the duplication. It was the same patch. It has some minor
update in the cover-letter to include some KVM guest test results. I was
having problem locating the patch from the LKML list and so I thought
they had failed to be sent out properly.
-Longman
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>,
Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>,
Chegu Vino
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] qspinlock: a 4-byte queue spinlock with PV support
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 13:25:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <530F82FD.1060000@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140227083715.GY9987@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 02/27/2014 03:37 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Is this the same 8 patches you send yesterday?
Sorry for the duplication. It was the same patch. It has some minor
update in the cover-letter to include some KVM guest test results. I was
having problem locating the patch from the LKML list and so I thought
they had failed to be sent out properly.
-Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-27 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-27 4:32 [PATCH v5 0/8] qspinlock: a 4-byte queue spinlock with PV support Waiman Long
2014-02-27 4:32 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation Waiman Long
2014-02-27 4:32 ` Waiman Long
2014-03-02 13:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-03-02 13:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-03-04 14:46 ` Waiman Long
2014-03-04 14:46 ` Waiman Long
2014-03-04 14:46 ` Waiman Long
2014-03-02 13:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-03-04 14:58 ` Waiman Long
2014-03-04 14:58 ` Waiman Long
2014-03-04 14:58 ` Waiman Long
2014-03-02 13:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-27 4:32 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] qspinlock, x86: Enable x86-64 to use queue spinlock Waiman Long
2014-03-02 14:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-03-02 14:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-03-04 15:06 ` Waiman Long
2014-03-04 15:06 ` Waiman Long
2014-03-04 15:06 ` Waiman Long
2014-02-27 4:32 ` Waiman Long
2014-02-27 4:32 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] qspinlock, x86: Add x86 specific optimization for 2 contending tasks Waiman Long
2014-03-02 13:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-03-04 14:54 ` Waiman Long
2014-03-04 14:54 ` Waiman Long
2014-03-04 14:54 ` Waiman Long
2014-03-02 13:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-02-27 4:32 ` Waiman Long
2014-02-27 4:32 ` [PATCH RFC v5 4/8] pvqspinlock, x86: Allow unfair spinlock in a real PV environment Waiman Long
2014-02-27 4:32 ` Waiman Long
2014-02-27 4:32 ` [PATCH RFC v5 5/8] pvqspinlock, x86: Enable unfair queue spinlock in a KVM guest Waiman Long
2014-02-27 4:32 ` Waiman Long
2014-02-27 4:32 ` [PATCH RFC v5 6/8] pvqspinlock, x86: Rename paravirt_ticketlocks_enabled Waiman Long
2014-02-27 4:32 ` Waiman Long
2014-02-27 4:32 ` [PATCH RFC v5 7/8] pvqspinlock, x86: Add qspinlock para-virtualization support Waiman Long
2014-02-27 4:32 ` Waiman Long
2014-02-27 4:32 ` [PATCH RFC v5 8/8] pvqspinlock, x86: Enable KVM to use qspinlock's PV support Waiman Long
2014-02-27 4:32 ` Waiman Long
2014-02-27 8:37 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] qspinlock: a 4-byte queue spinlock with " Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-27 8:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-27 8:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-27 18:25 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2014-02-27 18:25 ` Waiman Long
2014-02-27 18:25 ` Waiman Long
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-02-27 4:32 Waiman Long
2014-02-26 15:14 Waiman Long
2014-02-26 15:14 Waiman Long
2014-02-26 17:00 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-28 16:56 ` Waiman Long
2014-02-28 16:56 ` Waiman Long
2014-02-26 17:00 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-02-26 22:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-26 22:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=530F82FD.1060000@hp.com \
--to=waiman.long@hp.com \
--cc=akataria@vmware.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=walken@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.