From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172] helo=ns3.lanforge.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1WJ9gH-0007YU-5s for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 22:43:59 +0000 Received: from [192.168.100.236] (firewall.candelatech.com [70.89.124.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns3.lanforge.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s1RMhUum013762 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 14:43:31 -0800 Message-ID: <530FBF92.1050301@candelatech.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 14:43:30 -0800 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Anyone see 'tx not flushed' problems? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: ath10k I'm seeing lots of such issues, but this is when using lots of station vifs on my modified firmware. From some extra debug prints I put in, it appears pending_tx just never goes to zero (I've seen values in hundreds.) If anyone else sees these errors in their logs I'm very interested to know. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k