From: Don Slutz <dslutz@verizon.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Don Slutz <dslutz@verizon.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] hpet: Act more like real hardware
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:56:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <530FD0CA.5080906@terremark.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <530F116F020000780011FC45@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 02/27/14 04:20, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 26.02.14 at 19:00, Don Slutz <dslutz@verizon.com> wrote:
>> Currently in 32 bit mode the routine hpet_set_timer() will convert a
>> time in the past to a time in future. This is done by the uint32_t
>> cast of diff.
>>
>> Even without this issue, hpet_tick_to_ns() does not support past
>> times.
>>
>> Real hardware does not support past times.
>>
>> So just do the same thing in 32 bit mode as 64 bit mode.
> While the change looks valid at the first glance, what I'm missing
> is an explanation of how the problem that the introduction of this
> fixed (c/s 13495:e2539ab3580a "[HVM] Fix slow wallclock in x64
> Vista") is now being taken care of (or why this is of no concern).
> That's pretty relevant considering for how long this code has been
> there without causing (known) problems to anyone.
Ok, digging around (the git version):
commit f545359b1c54f59be9d7c27112a68c51c45b06b5
Date: Thu Jan 18 18:54:28 2007 +0000
[HVM] Fix slow wallclock in x64 Vista. This is due to confusing a
And one that changed how it worked:
commit 73ee2f2e11fcdc27aae4f8caa72d240c4c9ed5ac
Date: Tue Jan 8 16:20:04 2008 +0000
hvm: hpet: Fix overflow when converting to nanoseconds.
Is when a past time was prevented. Which may well have caused x64 Vista to have wallclock issues.
Next:
commit e1845bbe732b5ad5755f0f3a93fb6ea85919e8a2
Date: Sat May 24 09:27:03 2008 +0100
hvm: Build guest timers on monotonic system time.
Has a chance to do 2 things:
1) Make the diff < 0 very unlikely
2) Fixed x64 Vista wallclock issues (again)
Looking closer at hpet_tick_to_ns() and doing some math. I get:
h->stime_freq = S_TO_NS;
h->hpet_to_ns_scale = ((S_TO_NS * STIME_PER_HPET_TICK) << 10) / h->stime_freq;
I.E.
h->hpet_to_ns_scale = STIME_PER_HPET_TICK << 10;
And so:
#define hpet_tick_to_ns(h, tick) \
((s_time_t)((((tick) > (h)->hpet_to_ns_limit) ? \
~0ULL : (tick) * (h)->hpet_to_ns_scale) >> 10))
Is really:
#define hpet_tick_to_ns(h, tick) \
((s_time_t)((((tick) > (h)->hpet_to_ns_limit) ? \
(~0ULL >> 10) : (tick) * STIME_PER_HPET_TICK))
And if you change to using a signed multiply most of the time you will be fine. If you want a complex that is "safer":
#define hpet_tick_to_ns(tick) \
((s_time_t)(tick) >= 0 ? \
(s_time_t)(tick) * (s_time_t)STIME_PER_HPET_TICK >= 0 ? \
(s_time_t)(tick) * (s_time_t)STIME_PER_HPET_TICK : \
(s_time_t)(~0ULL >> 10) : \
(s_time_t)(tick) * (s_time_t)STIME_PER_HPET_TICK < 0 ? \
(s_time_t)(tick) * (s_time_t)STIME_PER_HPET_TICK : \
0)
If the signed multiply overflows in the positive case then the old max is returned. Note: this can return larger values then the old max.
So I can re-work the patch to use this and still provide past times. Which path should I go with?
-Don Slutz
> Jan
>
>> Without this change it is possible for an HVM guest running linux to
>> get the message:
>>
>> ..MP-BIOS bug: 8254 timer not connected to IO-APIC
>>
>> On the guest console(s); and will panic.
>>
>> Also Xen hypervisor console with be flooded with:
>>
>> vioapic.c:352:d1 Unsupported delivery mode 7
>> vioapic.c:352:d1 Unsupported delivery mode 7
>> vioapic.c:352:d1 Unsupported delivery mode 7
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Don Slutz <dslutz@verizon.com>
>> ---
>> xen/arch/x86/hvm/hpet.c | 13 +++----------
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hpet.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hpet.c
>> index 4324b52..14b1a39 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hpet.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hpet.c
>> @@ -197,10 +197,6 @@ static void hpet_stop_timer(HPETState *h, unsigned int tn)
>> hpet_get_comparator(h, tn);
>> }
>>
>> -/* the number of HPET tick that stands for
>> - * 1/(2^10) second, namely, 0.9765625 milliseconds */
>> -#define HPET_TINY_TIME_SPAN ((h->stime_freq >> 10) / STIME_PER_HPET_TICK)
>> -
>> static void hpet_set_timer(HPETState *h, unsigned int tn)
>> {
>> uint64_t tn_cmp, cur_tick, diff;
>> @@ -231,14 +227,11 @@ static void hpet_set_timer(HPETState *h, unsigned int tn)
>> diff = tn_cmp - cur_tick;
>>
>> /*
>> - * Detect time values set in the past. This is hard to do for 32-bit
>> - * comparators as the timer does not have to be set that far in the future
>> - * for the counter difference to wrap a 32-bit signed integer. We fudge
>> - * by looking for a 'small' time value in the past.
>> + * Detect time values set in the past. Since hpet_tick_to_ns() does
>> + * not handle this, use 0 for both 64 and 32 bit mode.
>> */
>> if ( (int64_t)diff < 0 )
>> - diff = (timer_is_32bit(h, tn) && (-diff > HPET_TINY_TIME_SPAN))
>> - ? (uint32_t)diff : 0;
>> + diff = 0;
>>
>> if ( (tn <= 1) && (h->hpet.config & HPET_CFG_LEGACY) )
>> /* if LegacyReplacementRoute bit is set, HPET specification requires
>> --
>> 1.8.4
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-27 23:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-26 18:00 [PATCH 0/1] Prevent one cause of "MP-BIOS bug: 8254 timer"... message from linux Don Slutz
2014-02-26 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/1] hpet: Act more like real hardware Don Slutz
2014-02-27 9:20 ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-27 23:56 ` Don Slutz [this message]
2014-02-28 9:06 ` Jan Beulich
2014-02-28 14:01 ` Don Slutz
2014-03-11 19:20 ` Don Slutz
2014-03-12 8:48 ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-12 13:43 ` Slutz, Donald Christopher
2014-03-12 19:23 ` Slutz, Donald Christopher
2014-04-08 23:42 ` Don Slutz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=530FD0CA.5080906@terremark.com \
--to=dslutz@verizon.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.