* [PATCH 01/11] sched: shortcut to remove load_idx
2014-02-25 1:50 [PATCH V4 0/11] sched: remove cpu_loads Alex Shi
@ 2014-02-25 1:50 ` Alex Shi
2014-02-25 1:50 ` [PATCH 02/11] sched: remove rq->cpu_load[load_idx] array Alex Shi
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Alex Shi @ 2014-02-25 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo, peterz, morten.rasmussen
Cc: vincent.guittot, daniel.lezcano, fweisbec, linux, tony.luck,
fenghua.yu, james.hogan, alex.shi, jason.low2, viresh.kumar,
hanjun.guo, linux-kernel, tglx, akpm, arjan, pjt, fengguang.wu,
linaro-kernel, wangyun, mgorman
Shortcut to remove rq->cpu_load[load_idx] effect in scheduler.
In five load idx, only busy_idx, idle_idx are not zero.
Newidle_idx, wake_idx and fork_idx are all zero in all archs.
So, change the idx to zero here can fully remove load_idx effect.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 5f6ddbe..0cfc3fd 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5908,7 +5908,7 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sd
if (child && child->flags & SD_PREFER_SIBLING)
prefer_sibling = 1;
- load_idx = get_sd_load_idx(env->sd, env->idle);
+ load_idx = 0;
do {
struct sg_lb_stats *sgs = &tmp_sgs;
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH 02/11] sched: remove rq->cpu_load[load_idx] array
2014-02-25 1:50 [PATCH V4 0/11] sched: remove cpu_loads Alex Shi
2014-02-25 1:50 ` [PATCH 01/11] sched: shortcut to remove load_idx Alex Shi
@ 2014-02-25 1:50 ` Alex Shi
2014-02-25 16:22 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-02-25 1:50 ` [PATCH 03/11] sched: clean up cpu_load update Alex Shi
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Alex Shi @ 2014-02-25 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo, peterz, morten.rasmussen
Cc: vincent.guittot, daniel.lezcano, fweisbec, linux, tony.luck,
fenghua.yu, james.hogan, alex.shi, jason.low2, viresh.kumar,
hanjun.guo, linux-kernel, tglx, akpm, arjan, pjt, fengguang.wu,
linaro-kernel, wangyun, mgorman
Since load_idx effect removed in load balance, we don't need the
load_idx decays in scheduler. that will save some process in sched_tick
and others places.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
---
arch/ia64/include/asm/topology.h | 5 ---
arch/metag/include/asm/topology.h | 5 ---
arch/tile/include/asm/topology.h | 6 ---
include/linux/sched.h | 5 ---
include/linux/topology.h | 8 ----
kernel/sched/core.c | 58 +++++++-----------------
kernel/sched/debug.c | 6 +--
kernel/sched/fair.c | 79 +++++++++------------------------
kernel/sched/proc.c | 92 ++-------------------------------------
kernel/sched/sched.h | 3 +-
10 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 225 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/topology.h
index a2496e4..54e5b17 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/topology.h
+++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/topology.h
@@ -55,11 +55,6 @@ void build_cpu_to_node_map(void);
.busy_factor = 64, \
.imbalance_pct = 125, \
.cache_nice_tries = 2, \
- .busy_idx = 2, \
- .idle_idx = 1, \
- .newidle_idx = 0, \
- .wake_idx = 0, \
- .forkexec_idx = 0, \
.flags = SD_LOAD_BALANCE \
| SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE \
| SD_BALANCE_EXEC \
diff --git a/arch/metag/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/metag/include/asm/topology.h
index 8e9c0b3..d1d15cd 100644
--- a/arch/metag/include/asm/topology.h
+++ b/arch/metag/include/asm/topology.h
@@ -13,11 +13,6 @@
.busy_factor = 32, \
.imbalance_pct = 125, \
.cache_nice_tries = 2, \
- .busy_idx = 3, \
- .idle_idx = 2, \
- .newidle_idx = 0, \
- .wake_idx = 0, \
- .forkexec_idx = 0, \
.flags = SD_LOAD_BALANCE \
| SD_BALANCE_FORK \
| SD_BALANCE_EXEC \
diff --git a/arch/tile/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/tile/include/asm/topology.h
index d15c0d8..05f6ffe 100644
--- a/arch/tile/include/asm/topology.h
+++ b/arch/tile/include/asm/topology.h
@@ -57,12 +57,6 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
.busy_factor = 64, \
.imbalance_pct = 125, \
.cache_nice_tries = 1, \
- .busy_idx = 2, \
- .idle_idx = 1, \
- .newidle_idx = 0, \
- .wake_idx = 0, \
- .forkexec_idx = 0, \
- \
.flags = 1*SD_LOAD_BALANCE \
| 1*SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE \
| 1*SD_BALANCE_EXEC \
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 825ed83..60c18de 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -892,11 +892,6 @@ struct sched_domain {
unsigned int busy_factor; /* less balancing by factor if busy */
unsigned int imbalance_pct; /* No balance until over watermark */
unsigned int cache_nice_tries; /* Leave cache hot tasks for # tries */
- unsigned int busy_idx;
- unsigned int idle_idx;
- unsigned int newidle_idx;
- unsigned int wake_idx;
- unsigned int forkexec_idx;
unsigned int smt_gain;
int nohz_idle; /* NOHZ IDLE status */
diff --git a/include/linux/topology.h b/include/linux/topology.h
index 12ae6ce..863fad3 100644
--- a/include/linux/topology.h
+++ b/include/linux/topology.h
@@ -121,9 +121,6 @@ int arch_update_cpu_topology(void);
.busy_factor = 64, \
.imbalance_pct = 125, \
.cache_nice_tries = 1, \
- .busy_idx = 2, \
- .wake_idx = 0, \
- .forkexec_idx = 0, \
\
.flags = 1*SD_LOAD_BALANCE \
| 1*SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE \
@@ -151,11 +148,6 @@ int arch_update_cpu_topology(void);
.busy_factor = 64, \
.imbalance_pct = 125, \
.cache_nice_tries = 1, \
- .busy_idx = 2, \
- .idle_idx = 1, \
- .newidle_idx = 0, \
- .wake_idx = 0, \
- .forkexec_idx = 0, \
\
.flags = 1*SD_LOAD_BALANCE \
| 1*SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE \
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 84b23ce..c156c9b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4843,64 +4843,45 @@ static void sd_free_ctl_entry(struct ctl_table **tablep)
*tablep = NULL;
}
-static int min_load_idx = 0;
-static int max_load_idx = CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX-1;
-
static void
set_table_entry(struct ctl_table *entry,
const char *procname, void *data, int maxlen,
- umode_t mode, proc_handler *proc_handler,
- bool load_idx)
+ umode_t mode, proc_handler *proc_handler)
{
entry->procname = procname;
entry->data = data;
entry->maxlen = maxlen;
entry->mode = mode;
entry->proc_handler = proc_handler;
-
- if (load_idx) {
- entry->extra1 = &min_load_idx;
- entry->extra2 = &max_load_idx;
- }
}
static struct ctl_table *
sd_alloc_ctl_domain_table(struct sched_domain *sd)
{
- struct ctl_table *table = sd_alloc_ctl_entry(14);
+ struct ctl_table *table = sd_alloc_ctl_entry(9);
if (table == NULL)
return NULL;
set_table_entry(&table[0], "min_interval", &sd->min_interval,
- sizeof(long), 0644, proc_doulongvec_minmax, false);
+ sizeof(long), 0644, proc_doulongvec_minmax);
set_table_entry(&table[1], "max_interval", &sd->max_interval,
- sizeof(long), 0644, proc_doulongvec_minmax, false);
- set_table_entry(&table[2], "busy_idx", &sd->busy_idx,
- sizeof(int), 0644, proc_dointvec_minmax, true);
- set_table_entry(&table[3], "idle_idx", &sd->idle_idx,
- sizeof(int), 0644, proc_dointvec_minmax, true);
- set_table_entry(&table[4], "newidle_idx", &sd->newidle_idx,
- sizeof(int), 0644, proc_dointvec_minmax, true);
- set_table_entry(&table[5], "wake_idx", &sd->wake_idx,
- sizeof(int), 0644, proc_dointvec_minmax, true);
- set_table_entry(&table[6], "forkexec_idx", &sd->forkexec_idx,
- sizeof(int), 0644, proc_dointvec_minmax, true);
- set_table_entry(&table[7], "busy_factor", &sd->busy_factor,
- sizeof(int), 0644, proc_dointvec_minmax, false);
- set_table_entry(&table[8], "imbalance_pct", &sd->imbalance_pct,
- sizeof(int), 0644, proc_dointvec_minmax, false);
- set_table_entry(&table[9], "cache_nice_tries",
+ sizeof(long), 0644, proc_doulongvec_minmax);
+ set_table_entry(&table[2], "busy_factor", &sd->busy_factor,
+ sizeof(int), 0644, proc_dointvec_minmax);
+ set_table_entry(&table[3], "imbalance_pct", &sd->imbalance_pct,
+ sizeof(int), 0644, proc_dointvec_minmax);
+ set_table_entry(&table[4], "cache_nice_tries",
&sd->cache_nice_tries,
- sizeof(int), 0644, proc_dointvec_minmax, false);
+ sizeof(int), 0644, proc_dointvec_minmax);
set_table_entry(&table[10], "flags", &sd->flags,
- sizeof(int), 0644, proc_dointvec_minmax, false);
+ sizeof(int), 0644, proc_dointvec_minmax);
set_table_entry(&table[11], "max_newidle_lb_cost",
&sd->max_newidle_lb_cost,
- sizeof(long), 0644, proc_doulongvec_minmax, false);
+ sizeof(long), 0644, proc_doulongvec_minmax);
set_table_entry(&table[12], "name", sd->name,
- CORENAME_MAX_SIZE, 0444, proc_dostring, false);
- /* &table[13] is terminator */
+ CORENAME_MAX_SIZE, 0444, proc_dostring);
+ /* &table[8] is terminator */
return table;
}
@@ -6023,11 +6004,6 @@ sd_numa_init(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl, int cpu)
.busy_factor = 32,
.imbalance_pct = 125,
.cache_nice_tries = 2,
- .busy_idx = 3,
- .idle_idx = 2,
- .newidle_idx = 0,
- .wake_idx = 0,
- .forkexec_idx = 0,
.flags = 1*SD_LOAD_BALANCE
| 1*SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE
@@ -6777,7 +6753,7 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, load_balance_mask);
void __init sched_init(void)
{
- int i, j;
+ int i;
unsigned long alloc_size = 0, ptr;
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
@@ -6880,9 +6856,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
init_tg_rt_entry(&root_task_group, &rq->rt, NULL, i, NULL);
#endif
- for (j = 0; j < CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX; j++)
- rq->cpu_load[j] = 0;
-
+ rq->cpu_load = 0;
rq->last_load_update_tick = jiffies;
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
index f3344c3..a24d549 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
@@ -303,11 +303,7 @@ do { \
PN(next_balance);
SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %ld\n", "curr->pid", (long)(task_pid_nr(rq->curr)));
PN(clock);
- P(cpu_load[0]);
- P(cpu_load[1]);
- P(cpu_load[2]);
- P(cpu_load[3]);
- P(cpu_load[4]);
+ P(cpu_load);
#undef P
#undef PN
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 0cfc3fd..df9c8b5 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1015,8 +1015,8 @@ bool should_numa_migrate_memory(struct task_struct *p, struct page * page,
}
static unsigned long weighted_cpuload(const int cpu);
-static unsigned long source_load(int cpu, int type);
-static unsigned long target_load(int cpu, int type);
+static unsigned long source_load(int cpu);
+static unsigned long target_load(int cpu);
static unsigned long power_of(int cpu);
static long effective_load(struct task_group *tg, int cpu, long wl, long wg);
@@ -3962,30 +3962,30 @@ static unsigned long weighted_cpuload(const int cpu)
* We want to under-estimate the load of migration sources, to
* balance conservatively.
*/
-static unsigned long source_load(int cpu, int type)
+static unsigned long source_load(int cpu)
{
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
unsigned long total = weighted_cpuload(cpu);
- if (type == 0 || !sched_feat(LB_BIAS))
+ if (!sched_feat(LB_BIAS))
return total;
- return min(rq->cpu_load[type-1], total);
+ return min(rq->cpu_load, total);
}
/*
* Return a high guess at the load of a migration-target cpu weighted
* according to the scheduling class and "nice" value.
*/
-static unsigned long target_load(int cpu, int type)
+static unsigned long target_load(int cpu)
{
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
unsigned long total = weighted_cpuload(cpu);
- if (type == 0 || !sched_feat(LB_BIAS))
+ if (!sched_feat(LB_BIAS))
return total;
- return max(rq->cpu_load[type-1], total);
+ return max(rq->cpu_load, total);
}
static unsigned long power_of(int cpu)
@@ -4185,7 +4185,7 @@ static int wake_wide(struct task_struct *p)
static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int sync)
{
s64 this_load, load;
- int idx, this_cpu, prev_cpu;
+ int this_cpu, prev_cpu;
unsigned long tl_per_task;
struct task_group *tg;
unsigned long weight;
@@ -4198,11 +4198,10 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int sync)
if (wake_wide(p))
return 0;
- idx = sd->wake_idx;
this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
prev_cpu = task_cpu(p);
- load = source_load(prev_cpu, idx);
- this_load = target_load(this_cpu, idx);
+ load = source_load(prev_cpu);
+ this_load = target_load(this_cpu);
/*
* If sync wakeup then subtract the (maximum possible)
@@ -4258,7 +4257,7 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int sync)
if (balanced ||
(this_load <= load &&
- this_load + target_load(prev_cpu, idx) <= tl_per_task)) {
+ this_load + target_load(prev_cpu) <= tl_per_task)) {
/*
* This domain has SD_WAKE_AFFINE and
* p is cache cold in this domain, and
@@ -4277,17 +4276,12 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int sync)
* domain.
*/
static struct sched_group *
-find_idlest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p,
- int this_cpu, int sd_flag)
+find_idlest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int this_cpu)
{
struct sched_group *idlest = NULL, *group = sd->groups;
unsigned long min_load = ULONG_MAX, this_load = 0;
- int load_idx = sd->forkexec_idx;
int imbalance = 100 + (sd->imbalance_pct-100)/2;
- if (sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_WAKE)
- load_idx = sd->wake_idx;
-
do {
unsigned long load, avg_load;
int local_group;
@@ -4307,9 +4301,9 @@ find_idlest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p,
for_each_cpu(i, sched_group_cpus(group)) {
/* Bias balancing toward cpus of our domain */
if (local_group)
- load = source_load(i, load_idx);
+ load = source_load(i);
else
- load = target_load(i, load_idx);
+ load = target_load(i);
avg_load += load;
}
@@ -4464,7 +4458,7 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int sd_flag, int wake_f
continue;
}
- group = find_idlest_group(sd, p, cpu, sd_flag);
+ group = find_idlest_group(sd, p, cpu);
if (!group) {
sd = sd->child;
continue;
@@ -5495,34 +5489,6 @@ static inline void init_sd_lb_stats(struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
};
}
-/**
- * get_sd_load_idx - Obtain the load index for a given sched domain.
- * @sd: The sched_domain whose load_idx is to be obtained.
- * @idle: The idle status of the CPU for whose sd load_idx is obtained.
- *
- * Return: The load index.
- */
-static inline int get_sd_load_idx(struct sched_domain *sd,
- enum cpu_idle_type idle)
-{
- int load_idx;
-
- switch (idle) {
- case CPU_NOT_IDLE:
- load_idx = sd->busy_idx;
- break;
-
- case CPU_NEWLY_IDLE:
- load_idx = sd->newidle_idx;
- break;
- default:
- load_idx = sd->idle_idx;
- break;
- }
-
- return load_idx;
-}
-
static unsigned long default_scale_freq_power(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
{
return SCHED_POWER_SCALE;
@@ -5770,12 +5736,11 @@ static inline int sg_capacity(struct lb_env *env, struct sched_group *group)
* update_sg_lb_stats - Update sched_group's statistics for load balancing.
* @env: The load balancing environment.
* @group: sched_group whose statistics are to be updated.
- * @load_idx: Load index of sched_domain of this_cpu for load calc.
* @local_group: Does group contain this_cpu.
* @sgs: variable to hold the statistics for this group.
*/
static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
- struct sched_group *group, int load_idx,
+ struct sched_group *group,
int local_group, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
{
unsigned long load;
@@ -5788,9 +5753,9 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
/* Bias balancing toward cpus of our domain */
if (local_group)
- load = target_load(i, load_idx);
+ load = target_load(i);
else
- load = source_load(i, load_idx);
+ load = source_load(i);
sgs->group_load += load;
sgs->sum_nr_running += rq->nr_running;
@@ -5903,13 +5868,11 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sd
struct sched_domain *child = env->sd->child;
struct sched_group *sg = env->sd->groups;
struct sg_lb_stats tmp_sgs;
- int load_idx, prefer_sibling = 0;
+ int prefer_sibling = 0;
if (child && child->flags & SD_PREFER_SIBLING)
prefer_sibling = 1;
- load_idx = 0;
-
do {
struct sg_lb_stats *sgs = &tmp_sgs;
int local_group;
@@ -5924,7 +5887,7 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sd
update_group_power(env->sd, env->dst_cpu);
}
- update_sg_lb_stats(env, sg, load_idx, local_group, sgs);
+ update_sg_lb_stats(env, sg, local_group, sgs);
if (local_group)
goto next_group;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/proc.c b/kernel/sched/proc.c
index 16f5a30..a2435c5 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/proc.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/proc.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
unsigned long this_cpu_load(void)
{
struct rq *this = this_rq();
- return this->cpu_load[0];
+ return this->cpu_load;
}
@@ -398,105 +398,19 @@ static void calc_load_account_active(struct rq *this_rq)
* End of global load-average stuff
*/
-/*
- * The exact cpuload at various idx values, calculated at every tick would be
- * load = (2^idx - 1) / 2^idx * load + 1 / 2^idx * cur_load
- *
- * If a cpu misses updates for n-1 ticks (as it was idle) and update gets called
- * on nth tick when cpu may be busy, then we have:
- * load = ((2^idx - 1) / 2^idx)^(n-1) * load
- * load = (2^idx - 1) / 2^idx) * load + 1 / 2^idx * cur_load
- *
- * decay_load_missed() below does efficient calculation of
- * load = ((2^idx - 1) / 2^idx)^(n-1) * load
- * avoiding 0..n-1 loop doing load = ((2^idx - 1) / 2^idx) * load
- *
- * The calculation is approximated on a 128 point scale.
- * degrade_zero_ticks is the number of ticks after which load at any
- * particular idx is approximated to be zero.
- * degrade_factor is a precomputed table, a row for each load idx.
- * Each column corresponds to degradation factor for a power of two ticks,
- * based on 128 point scale.
- * Example:
- * row 2, col 3 (=12) says that the degradation at load idx 2 after
- * 8 ticks is 12/128 (which is an approximation of exact factor 3^8/4^8).
- *
- * With this power of 2 load factors, we can degrade the load n times
- * by looking at 1 bits in n and doing as many mult/shift instead of
- * n mult/shifts needed by the exact degradation.
- */
-#define DEGRADE_SHIFT 7
-static const unsigned char
- degrade_zero_ticks[CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX] = {0, 8, 32, 64, 128};
-static const unsigned char
- degrade_factor[CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX][DEGRADE_SHIFT + 1] = {
- {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0},
- {64, 32, 8, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0},
- {96, 72, 40, 12, 1, 0, 0},
- {112, 98, 75, 43, 15, 1, 0},
- {120, 112, 98, 76, 45, 16, 2} };
/*
- * Update cpu_load for any missed ticks, due to tickless idle. The backlog
- * would be when CPU is idle and so we just decay the old load without
- * adding any new load.
- */
-static unsigned long
-decay_load_missed(unsigned long load, unsigned long missed_updates, int idx)
-{
- int j = 0;
-
- if (!missed_updates)
- return load;
-
- if (missed_updates >= degrade_zero_ticks[idx])
- return 0;
-
- if (idx == 1)
- return load >> missed_updates;
-
- while (missed_updates) {
- if (missed_updates % 2)
- load = (load * degrade_factor[idx][j]) >> DEGRADE_SHIFT;
-
- missed_updates >>= 1;
- j++;
- }
- return load;
-}
-
-/*
- * Update rq->cpu_load[] statistics. This function is usually called every
+ * Update rq->cpu_load statistics. This function is usually called every
* scheduler tick (TICK_NSEC). With tickless idle this will not be called
* every tick. We fix it up based on jiffies.
*/
static void __update_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned long this_load,
unsigned long pending_updates)
{
- int i, scale;
-
this_rq->nr_load_updates++;
/* Update our load: */
- this_rq->cpu_load[0] = this_load; /* Fasttrack for idx 0 */
- for (i = 1, scale = 2; i < CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX; i++, scale += scale) {
- unsigned long old_load, new_load;
-
- /* scale is effectively 1 << i now, and >> i divides by scale */
-
- old_load = this_rq->cpu_load[i];
- old_load = decay_load_missed(old_load, pending_updates - 1, i);
- new_load = this_load;
- /*
- * Round up the averaging division if load is increasing. This
- * prevents us from getting stuck on 9 if the load is 10, for
- * example.
- */
- if (new_load > old_load)
- new_load += scale - 1;
-
- this_rq->cpu_load[i] = (old_load * (scale - 1) + new_load) >> i;
- }
+ this_rq->cpu_load = this_load; /* Fasttrack for idx 0 */
sched_avg_update(this_rq);
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 4be68da..30efb79 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -516,8 +516,7 @@ struct rq {
unsigned int nr_numa_running;
unsigned int nr_preferred_running;
#endif
- #define CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX 5
- unsigned long cpu_load[CPU_LOAD_IDX_MAX];
+ unsigned long cpu_load;
unsigned long last_load_update_tick;
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
u64 nohz_stamp;
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 02/11] sched: remove rq->cpu_load[load_idx] array
2014-02-25 1:50 ` [PATCH 02/11] sched: remove rq->cpu_load[load_idx] array Alex Shi
@ 2014-02-25 16:22 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-02-26 1:54 ` Alex Shi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Srikar Dronamraju @ 2014-02-25 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Shi
Cc: mingo, peterz, morten.rasmussen, vincent.guittot, daniel.lezcano,
fweisbec, linux, tony.luck, fenghua.yu, james.hogan, jason.low2,
viresh.kumar, hanjun.guo, linux-kernel, tglx, akpm, arjan, pjt,
fengguang.wu, linaro-kernel, wangyun, mgorman
>
> -/**
> - * get_sd_load_idx - Obtain the load index for a given sched domain.
> - * @sd: The sched_domain whose load_idx is to be obtained.
> - * @idle: The idle status of the CPU for whose sd load_idx is obtained.
> - *
> - * Return: The load index.
> - */
> -static inline int get_sd_load_idx(struct sched_domain *sd,
> - enum cpu_idle_type idle)
> -{
> - int load_idx;
> -
> - switch (idle) {
> - case CPU_NOT_IDLE:
> - load_idx = sd->busy_idx;
> - break;
> -
> - case CPU_NEWLY_IDLE:
> - load_idx = sd->newidle_idx;
> - break;
> - default:
> - load_idx = sd->idle_idx;
> - break;
> - }
> -
> - return load_idx;
> -}
> -
Since the last caller to get_sd_load_idx(), does it make sense to remove
the function definition for get_sd_load_idx() in the previous patch itself?
Or
> @@ -5903,13 +5868,11 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sd
> struct sched_domain *child = env->sd->child;
> struct sched_group *sg = env->sd->groups;
> struct sg_lb_stats tmp_sgs;
> - int load_idx, prefer_sibling = 0;
> + int prefer_sibling = 0;
>
> if (child && child->flags & SD_PREFER_SIBLING)
> prefer_sibling = 1;
>
> - load_idx = 0;
> -
> do {
> struct sg_lb_stats *sgs = &tmp_sgs;
> int local_group;
The single line change in the previous patch gets removed here so why
not club them.
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 02/11] sched: remove rq->cpu_load[load_idx] array
2014-02-25 16:22 ` Srikar Dronamraju
@ 2014-02-26 1:54 ` Alex Shi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Alex Shi @ 2014-02-26 1:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Srikar Dronamraju
Cc: mingo, peterz, morten.rasmussen, vincent.guittot, daniel.lezcano,
fweisbec, linux, tony.luck, fenghua.yu, james.hogan, jason.low2,
viresh.kumar, hanjun.guo, linux-kernel, tglx, akpm, arjan, pjt,
fengguang.wu, linaro-kernel, wangyun, mgorman
On 02/26/2014 12:22 AM, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>>
>> -/**
>> - * get_sd_load_idx - Obtain the load index for a given sched domain.
>> - * @sd: The sched_domain whose load_idx is to be obtained.
>> - * @idle: The idle status of the CPU for whose sd load_idx is obtained.
>> - *
>> - * Return: The load index.
>> - */
>> -static inline int get_sd_load_idx(struct sched_domain *sd,
>> - enum cpu_idle_type idle)
>> -{
>> - int load_idx;
>> -
>> - switch (idle) {
>> - case CPU_NOT_IDLE:
>> - load_idx = sd->busy_idx;
>> - break;
>> -
>> - case CPU_NEWLY_IDLE:
>> - load_idx = sd->newidle_idx;
>> - break;
>> - default:
>> - load_idx = sd->idle_idx;
>> - break;
>> - }
>> -
>> - return load_idx;
>> -}
>> -
>
> Since the last caller to get_sd_load_idx(), does it make sense to remove
> the function definition for get_sd_load_idx() in the previous patch itself?
yes. it's reasonable.
>
> Or
>
>> @@ -5903,13 +5868,11 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sd
>> struct sched_domain *child = env->sd->child;
>> struct sched_group *sg = env->sd->groups;
>> struct sg_lb_stats tmp_sgs;
>> - int load_idx, prefer_sibling = 0;
>> + int prefer_sibling = 0;
>>
>> if (child && child->flags & SD_PREFER_SIBLING)
>> prefer_sibling = 1;
>>
>> - load_idx = 0;
>> -
>> do {
>> struct sg_lb_stats *sgs = &tmp_sgs;
>> int local_group;
>
>
> The single line change in the previous patch gets removed here so why
> not club them.
Uh, the first patch want to just show the load_idx connection in current
logical.
Yes, we can club them, but this connection will be flooded in code.
--
Thanks
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 03/11] sched: clean up cpu_load update
2014-02-25 1:50 [PATCH V4 0/11] sched: remove cpu_loads Alex Shi
2014-02-25 1:50 ` [PATCH 01/11] sched: shortcut to remove load_idx Alex Shi
2014-02-25 1:50 ` [PATCH 02/11] sched: remove rq->cpu_load[load_idx] array Alex Shi
@ 2014-02-25 1:50 ` Alex Shi
2014-02-25 1:50 ` [PATCH 04/11] sched: unify imbalance bias for target group Alex Shi
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Alex Shi @ 2014-02-25 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo, peterz, morten.rasmussen
Cc: vincent.guittot, daniel.lezcano, fweisbec, linux, tony.luck,
fenghua.yu, james.hogan, alex.shi, jason.low2, viresh.kumar,
hanjun.guo, linux-kernel, tglx, akpm, arjan, pjt, fengguang.wu,
linaro-kernel, wangyun, mgorman
Since we don't decay the rq->cpu_load, so we don't need the
pending_updates. But we still want update rq->rt_avg, so
still keep rq->last_load_update_tick and func __update_cpu_load.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
---
kernel/sched/proc.c | 11 ++++-------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/proc.c b/kernel/sched/proc.c
index a2435c5..057bb9b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/proc.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/proc.c
@@ -404,8 +404,7 @@ static void calc_load_account_active(struct rq *this_rq)
* scheduler tick (TICK_NSEC). With tickless idle this will not be called
* every tick. We fix it up based on jiffies.
*/
-static void __update_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned long this_load,
- unsigned long pending_updates)
+static void __update_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned long this_load)
{
this_rq->nr_load_updates++;
@@ -449,7 +448,6 @@ void update_idle_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq)
{
unsigned long curr_jiffies = ACCESS_ONCE(jiffies);
unsigned long load = get_rq_runnable_load(this_rq);
- unsigned long pending_updates;
/*
* bail if there's load or we're actually up-to-date.
@@ -457,10 +455,9 @@ void update_idle_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq)
if (load || curr_jiffies == this_rq->last_load_update_tick)
return;
- pending_updates = curr_jiffies - this_rq->last_load_update_tick;
this_rq->last_load_update_tick = curr_jiffies;
- __update_cpu_load(this_rq, load, pending_updates);
+ __update_cpu_load(this_rq, load);
}
/*
@@ -483,7 +480,7 @@ void update_cpu_load_nohz(void)
* We were idle, this means load 0, the current load might be
* !0 due to remote wakeups and the sort.
*/
- __update_cpu_load(this_rq, 0, pending_updates);
+ __update_cpu_load(this_rq, 0);
}
raw_spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock);
}
@@ -499,7 +496,7 @@ void update_cpu_load_active(struct rq *this_rq)
* See the mess around update_idle_cpu_load() / update_cpu_load_nohz().
*/
this_rq->last_load_update_tick = jiffies;
- __update_cpu_load(this_rq, load, 1);
+ __update_cpu_load(this_rq, load);
calc_load_account_active(this_rq);
}
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH 04/11] sched: unify imbalance bias for target group
2014-02-25 1:50 [PATCH V4 0/11] sched: remove cpu_loads Alex Shi
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-02-25 1:50 ` [PATCH 03/11] sched: clean up cpu_load update Alex Shi
@ 2014-02-25 1:50 ` Alex Shi
2014-02-25 14:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-25 1:50 ` [PATCH 05/11] sched: rewrite update_cpu_load_nohz Alex Shi
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Alex Shi @ 2014-02-25 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo, peterz, morten.rasmussen
Cc: vincent.guittot, daniel.lezcano, fweisbec, linux, tony.luck,
fenghua.yu, james.hogan, alex.shi, jason.low2, viresh.kumar,
hanjun.guo, linux-kernel, tglx, akpm, arjan, pjt, fengguang.wu,
linaro-kernel, wangyun, mgorman
Old code considers the bias in source/target_load already. but still
use imbalance_pct as last check in idlest/busiest group finding. It is
also a kind of redundant job. If we bias imbalance in source/target_load,
we'd better not use imbalance_pct again.
After cpu_load array removed, it is nice time to unify the target bias
consideration. So I remove the imbalance_pct from last check and add the
live bias using.
On wake_affine, since all archs' wake_idx is 0, current logical is just
want to prefer current cpu. so we follows this logical. Just renaming the
target_load/source_load to wegithed_cpuload for more exact meaning.
Thanks for reminding from Morten!
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 32 +++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index df9c8b5..d7093ee 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1016,7 +1016,7 @@ bool should_numa_migrate_memory(struct task_struct *p, struct page * page,
static unsigned long weighted_cpuload(const int cpu);
static unsigned long source_load(int cpu);
-static unsigned long target_load(int cpu);
+static unsigned long target_load(int cpu, int imbalance_pct);
static unsigned long power_of(int cpu);
static long effective_load(struct task_group *tg, int cpu, long wl, long wg);
@@ -3977,7 +3977,7 @@ static unsigned long source_load(int cpu)
* Return a high guess at the load of a migration-target cpu weighted
* according to the scheduling class and "nice" value.
*/
-static unsigned long target_load(int cpu)
+static unsigned long target_load(int cpu, int imbalance_pct)
{
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
unsigned long total = weighted_cpuload(cpu);
@@ -3985,6 +3985,11 @@ static unsigned long target_load(int cpu)
if (!sched_feat(LB_BIAS))
return total;
+ /*
+ * Bias target load with imbalance_pct.
+ */
+ total = total * imbalance_pct / 100;
+
return max(rq->cpu_load, total);
}
@@ -4200,8 +4205,8 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int sync)
this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
prev_cpu = task_cpu(p);
- load = source_load(prev_cpu);
- this_load = target_load(this_cpu);
+ load = weighted_cpuload(prev_cpu);
+ this_load = weighted_cpuload(this_cpu);
/*
* If sync wakeup then subtract the (maximum possible)
@@ -4257,7 +4262,7 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int sync)
if (balanced ||
(this_load <= load &&
- this_load + target_load(prev_cpu) <= tl_per_task)) {
+ this_load + weighted_cpuload(prev_cpu) <= tl_per_task)) {
/*
* This domain has SD_WAKE_AFFINE and
* p is cache cold in this domain, and
@@ -4303,7 +4308,7 @@ find_idlest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int this_cpu)
if (local_group)
load = source_load(i);
else
- load = target_load(i);
+ load = target_load(i, imbalance);
avg_load += load;
}
@@ -4319,7 +4324,7 @@ find_idlest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int this_cpu)
}
} while (group = group->next, group != sd->groups);
- if (!idlest || 100*this_load < imbalance*min_load)
+ if (!idlest || this_load < min_load)
return NULL;
return idlest;
}
@@ -5745,6 +5750,7 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
{
unsigned long load;
int i;
+ int bias = 100 + (env->sd->imbalance_pct - 100) / 2;
memset(sgs, 0, sizeof(*sgs));
@@ -5752,8 +5758,8 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(i);
/* Bias balancing toward cpus of our domain */
- if (local_group)
- load = target_load(i);
+ if (local_group && env->idle != CPU_IDLE)
+ load = target_load(i, bias);
else
load = source_load(i);
@@ -6193,14 +6199,6 @@ static struct sched_group *find_busiest_group(struct lb_env *env)
if ((local->idle_cpus < busiest->idle_cpus) &&
busiest->sum_nr_running <= busiest->group_weight)
goto out_balanced;
- } else {
- /*
- * In the CPU_NEWLY_IDLE, CPU_NOT_IDLE cases, use
- * imbalance_pct to be conservative.
- */
- if (100 * busiest->avg_load <=
- env->sd->imbalance_pct * local->avg_load)
- goto out_balanced;
}
force_balance:
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 04/11] sched: unify imbalance bias for target group
2014-02-25 1:50 ` [PATCH 04/11] sched: unify imbalance bias for target group Alex Shi
@ 2014-02-25 14:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-26 15:16 ` Alex Shi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2014-02-25 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Shi
Cc: mingo, morten.rasmussen, vincent.guittot, daniel.lezcano,
fweisbec, linux, tony.luck, fenghua.yu, james.hogan, jason.low2,
viresh.kumar, hanjun.guo, linux-kernel, tglx, akpm, arjan, pjt,
fengguang.wu, linaro-kernel, wangyun, mgorman
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 09:50:47AM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> Old code considers the bias in source/target_load already. but still
> use imbalance_pct as last check in idlest/busiest group finding. It is
> also a kind of redundant job. If we bias imbalance in source/target_load,
> we'd better not use imbalance_pct again.
>
> After cpu_load array removed, it is nice time to unify the target bias
> consideration. So I remove the imbalance_pct from last check and add the
> live bias using.
>
> On wake_affine, since all archs' wake_idx is 0, current logical is just
> want to prefer current cpu. so we follows this logical. Just renaming the
> target_load/source_load to wegithed_cpuload for more exact meaning.
> Thanks for reminding from Morten!
>
So this patch is weird..
So the original bias in the source/target load is purely based on actual
load figures. It only pulls-down/pulls-up resp. the long term avg with a
shorter term average; iow. it allows the source to decrease faster and
the target to increase faster, giving a natural inertia (ie. a
resistance to movement).
Therefore this gives rise to a conservative imbalance.
Then at the end we use the imbalance_pct thing as a normal hysteresis
control to avoid the rapid state switching associated with a single
control point system.
You completely wreck that, you also don't give a coherent model back.
The movement of imbalance_pct into target_load() doesn't make sense to
me either; it's an (expensive) no-op afaict. Seeing how:
100 * source_load() < imb_pct * target_load()
is very much equal to:
source_load() < (imb_pct * target_load()) / 100;
Except you get to do that div all over the place.
It also completely muddles the fact that its a normal hysteresis
control. Not a load bias. A fixed bias can never replace the inertial
control we had; it doesn't make sense as a replacement.
Not to mention you seem to ignore all concerns wrt the use of longer
term averages for the bigger domains.
Now I'm all for removing code; and so far the numbers aren't bad; but I
don't like the complete muddle you make of things at all.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 04/11] sched: unify imbalance bias for target group
2014-02-25 14:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2014-02-26 15:16 ` Alex Shi
2014-03-02 1:44 ` Alex Shi
2014-03-12 10:36 ` Alex Shi
0 siblings, 2 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Alex Shi @ 2014-02-26 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: mingo, morten.rasmussen, vincent.guittot, daniel.lezcano,
fweisbec, linux, tony.luck, fenghua.yu, james.hogan, jason.low2,
viresh.kumar, hanjun.guo, linux-kernel, tglx, akpm, arjan, pjt,
fengguang.wu, linaro-kernel, wangyun, mgorman
> So this patch is weird..
>
> So the original bias in the source/target load is purely based on actual
> load figures. It only pulls-down/pulls-up resp. the long term avg with a
> shorter term average; iow. it allows the source to decrease faster and
> the target to increase faster, giving a natural inertia (ie. a
> resistance to movement).
>
> Therefore this gives rise to a conservative imbalance.
>
> Then at the end we use the imbalance_pct thing as a normal hysteresis
> control to avoid the rapid state switching associated with a single
> control point system.
Peter, Thanks response and detailed explanations! :)
Yes, fixed bias can not replace the current bias.
If we said sth inertia, we usually mean the previous value or long term
value here. but source/target_load doesn't prefer a long term or shorter
term load, Just get the min or max of them. so I can't see other meaning
except source/target bias. And the long term load is a decayed load with
history load value, not a real actual load.
And in current logical, assume the load of cpu is constant in a period,
then the source/target_load will lose its 'resistance' function for
balance. Considering the moving cost, rq locking and potential cpu cache
missing, Is some bias needed here?
Another problem is, we bias load twice for busy_idx scenario. once in
source/target_load another is imbalance_pct in find_busiest_group. I
can't figure out the reason. :(
So would rather select a random long/shorter term load, than maybe it's
better to use a fixed bias, like in current NUMA balancing, and in
newidle/wake balance.
>
>
> You completely wreck that, you also don't give a coherent model back.
>
>
> The movement of imbalance_pct into target_load() doesn't make sense to
> me either; it's an (expensive) no-op afaict. Seeing how:
>
> 100 * source_load() < imb_pct * target_load()
>
> is very much equal to:
>
> source_load() < (imb_pct * target_load()) / 100;
>
> Except you get to do that div all over the place.
It is my fault. Will change it back.
>
> It also completely muddles the fact that its a normal hysteresis
> control. Not a load bias. A fixed bias can never replace the inertial
> control we had; it doesn't make sense as a replacement.
I know fixed bias maybe not the best, but sorry for can not figure out
better one. Would you like to give some suggestion?
>
> Not to mention you seem to ignore all concerns wrt the use of longer
> term averages for the bigger domains.
For bigger domain, I given up the aggression bias idea(less bias on
large group) in V2 version due to Morten's concern. And I have asked for
more comments, but no more detailed concerns I can see now. :(
>
> Now I'm all for removing code; and so far the numbers aren't bad; but I
> don't like the complete muddle you make of things at all.
>
Sorry, do you mean the load_idx removing is fine, if without this fixed
bias? Or other suggestion here?
--
Thanks
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 04/11] sched: unify imbalance bias for target group
2014-02-26 15:16 ` Alex Shi
@ 2014-03-02 1:44 ` Alex Shi
2014-03-12 10:36 ` Alex Shi
1 sibling, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Alex Shi @ 2014-03-02 1:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: mingo, morten.rasmussen, vincent.guittot, daniel.lezcano,
fweisbec, linux, tony.luck, fenghua.yu, james.hogan, jason.low2,
viresh.kumar, hanjun.guo, linux-kernel, tglx, akpm, arjan, pjt,
fengguang.wu, linaro-kernel, wangyun, mgorman
Would you like to give more comments? :)
Thanks!
On 02/26/2014 11:16 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
>> >Now I'm all for removing code; and so far the numbers aren't bad; but I
>> >don't like the complete muddle you make of things at all.
>> >
> Sorry, do you mean the load_idx removing is fine, if without this fixed
> bias? Or other suggestion here?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 04/11] sched: unify imbalance bias for target group
2014-02-26 15:16 ` Alex Shi
2014-03-02 1:44 ` Alex Shi
@ 2014-03-12 10:36 ` Alex Shi
1 sibling, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Alex Shi @ 2014-03-12 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: mingo, morten.rasmussen, vincent.guittot, daniel.lezcano,
fweisbec, linux, tony.luck, fenghua.yu, james.hogan, jason.low2,
viresh.kumar, hanjun.guo, linux-kernel, tglx, akpm, arjan, pjt,
fengguang.wu, linaro-kernel, wangyun, mgorman
On 02/26/2014 11:16 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
>> > So this patch is weird..
>> >
>> > So the original bias in the source/target load is purely based on actual
>> > load figures. It only pulls-down/pulls-up resp. the long term avg with a
>> > shorter term average; iow. it allows the source to decrease faster and
>> > the target to increase faster, giving a natural inertia (ie. a
>> > resistance to movement).
>> >
>> > Therefore this gives rise to a conservative imbalance.
>> >
>> > Then at the end we use the imbalance_pct thing as a normal hysteresis
>> > control to avoid the rapid state switching associated with a single
>> > control point system.
> Peter, Thanks response and detailed explanations! :)
>
> Yes, fixed bias can not replace the current bias.
> If we said sth inertia, we usually mean the previous value or long term
> value here. but source/target_load doesn't prefer a long term or shorter
> term load, Just get the min or max of them. so I can't see other meaning
> except source/target bias. And the long term load is a decayed load with
> history load value, not a real actual load.
>
> And in current logical, assume the load of cpu is constant in a period,
> then the source/target_load will lose its 'resistance' function for
> balance. Considering the moving cost, rq locking and potential cpu cache
> missing, Is some bias needed here?
>
> Another problem is, we bias load twice for busy_idx scenario. once in
> source/target_load another is imbalance_pct in find_busiest_group. I
> can't figure out the reason. :(
>
> So would rather select a random long/shorter term load, than maybe it's
> better to use a fixed bias, like in current NUMA balancing, and in
> newidle/wake balance.
>
May I didn't say clear about the issue of cpu_load. So forgive my
verbose explanation again.
In 5 cpu load idx, only busy_idx and idle_idx are not zero, only they
are using long term load value.
The other idxes, wake_idx, forexec_idx and new_idle_idx are all zero.
They are using imbalance_pct as fixed bias consideration *only*, as well
as in numa balancing.
As to busy_idx,
We considered the cpu load history and src/dst bias both. But we are
wrong to mix them together. Considering long/short term load isn't
related with bias. The long term load consideration is done in runnable
load avg. And the bias value should be isolated and based on task
migration cost between cpu/groups.
Now we mix them together, the ridiculous thing is, when all cpu load are
continuous stable, long/short term load is same. then we lose the bias
meaning, so any minimum imbalance may cause unnecessary task moving. To
prevent this funny thing happen, we have to reuse the imbalance_pct
again in find_busiest_group(). But That clearly causes over bias in
normal time. If there are some burst load in system, it is more worse.
As to idle_idx, it is not use imbalance_pct at all.
Since short term load is zero, so it looks clearly, we pretend we are
long term load when cpu in dst group. or zero load, when cpu in src
group. But from maximum performance point view. It's better to balance
task to idle cpu. So we'd better to move tasks to dst group unless the
moving cost is beyond task migration cost, that is the imbalance_pct
for. Now pretending we have some load in dst group rejects the incoming
load we pretend have. And It also prefer to move task to long time idle
cpu, that actually costs performance/latency both since low latency of
deep c-state waking.
Anyway, for idle cpu load balance, since we are working on cpu idle
migration into scheduler. The problem must be reconsidered. We don't
need to care much now.
Base on above reasons, I believe mixing long term load with task moving
bias consideration is stupid. And I admit the imbalance_pct need more
tuning or even remake, but it is not a bad start, at least it is used in
balance anywhere now.
--
Thanks
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 05/11] sched: rewrite update_cpu_load_nohz
2014-02-25 1:50 [PATCH V4 0/11] sched: remove cpu_loads Alex Shi
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-02-25 1:50 ` [PATCH 04/11] sched: unify imbalance bias for target group Alex Shi
@ 2014-02-25 1:50 ` Alex Shi
2014-02-25 1:50 ` [PATCH 06/11] sched: clean up source_load/target_load Alex Shi
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Alex Shi @ 2014-02-25 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo, peterz, morten.rasmussen
Cc: vincent.guittot, daniel.lezcano, fweisbec, linux, tony.luck,
fenghua.yu, james.hogan, alex.shi, jason.low2, viresh.kumar,
hanjun.guo, linux-kernel, tglx, akpm, arjan, pjt, fengguang.wu,
linaro-kernel, wangyun, mgorman
After change to sched_avg, the cpu load in idle exit was decayed.
So, it maybe near zero if waking a long time sleep task, or, a full
non-decay load if waking a new forked task. Then, we can use it to
reflect the cpu load, don't need to pretend 0.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
---
kernel/sched/proc.c | 19 ++-----------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/proc.c b/kernel/sched/proc.c
index 057bb9b..383c4ba 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/proc.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/proc.c
@@ -461,28 +461,13 @@ void update_idle_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq)
}
/*
- * Called from tick_nohz_idle_exit() -- try and fix up the ticks we missed.
+ * Called from tick_nohz_idle_exit()
*/
void update_cpu_load_nohz(void)
{
struct rq *this_rq = this_rq();
- unsigned long curr_jiffies = ACCESS_ONCE(jiffies);
- unsigned long pending_updates;
-
- if (curr_jiffies == this_rq->last_load_update_tick)
- return;
- raw_spin_lock(&this_rq->lock);
- pending_updates = curr_jiffies - this_rq->last_load_update_tick;
- if (pending_updates) {
- this_rq->last_load_update_tick = curr_jiffies;
- /*
- * We were idle, this means load 0, the current load might be
- * !0 due to remote wakeups and the sort.
- */
- __update_cpu_load(this_rq, 0);
- }
- raw_spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock);
+ update_idle_cpu_load(this_rq);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ */
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH 06/11] sched: clean up source_load/target_load
2014-02-25 1:50 [PATCH V4 0/11] sched: remove cpu_loads Alex Shi
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-02-25 1:50 ` [PATCH 05/11] sched: rewrite update_cpu_load_nohz Alex Shi
@ 2014-02-25 1:50 ` Alex Shi
2014-02-25 1:50 ` [PATCH 07/11] sched: replace source_load by weighted_cpuload Alex Shi
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Alex Shi @ 2014-02-25 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo, peterz, morten.rasmussen
Cc: vincent.guittot, daniel.lezcano, fweisbec, linux, tony.luck,
fenghua.yu, james.hogan, alex.shi, jason.low2, viresh.kumar,
hanjun.guo, linux-kernel, tglx, akpm, arjan, pjt, fengguang.wu,
linaro-kernel, wangyun, mgorman
Don't need 'rq' variable now.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 13 ++-----------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index d7093ee..c5821b5 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3964,13 +3964,7 @@ static unsigned long weighted_cpuload(const int cpu)
*/
static unsigned long source_load(int cpu)
{
- struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
- unsigned long total = weighted_cpuload(cpu);
-
- if (!sched_feat(LB_BIAS))
- return total;
-
- return min(rq->cpu_load, total);
+ return weighted_cpuload(cpu);
}
/*
@@ -3979,7 +3973,6 @@ static unsigned long source_load(int cpu)
*/
static unsigned long target_load(int cpu, int imbalance_pct)
{
- struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
unsigned long total = weighted_cpuload(cpu);
if (!sched_feat(LB_BIAS))
@@ -3988,9 +3981,7 @@ static unsigned long target_load(int cpu, int imbalance_pct)
/*
* Bias target load with imbalance_pct.
*/
- total = total * imbalance_pct / 100;
-
- return max(rq->cpu_load, total);
+ return total * imbalance_pct / 100;
}
static unsigned long power_of(int cpu)
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH 07/11] sched: replace source_load by weighted_cpuload
2014-02-25 1:50 [PATCH V4 0/11] sched: remove cpu_loads Alex Shi
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2014-02-25 1:50 ` [PATCH 06/11] sched: clean up source_load/target_load Alex Shi
@ 2014-02-25 1:50 ` Alex Shi
2014-02-25 1:50 ` [PATCH 08/11] sched: replace target_load by biased_load Alex Shi
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Alex Shi @ 2014-02-25 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo, peterz, morten.rasmussen
Cc: vincent.guittot, daniel.lezcano, fweisbec, linux, tony.luck,
fenghua.yu, james.hogan, alex.shi, jason.low2, viresh.kumar,
hanjun.guo, linux-kernel, tglx, akpm, arjan, pjt, fengguang.wu,
linaro-kernel, wangyun, mgorman
Now, without load_idx source_load is just weighted_cpuload, so
replace it to reduce a conception for cpu load.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 21 ++++-----------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index c5821b5..5feb51b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1015,7 +1015,6 @@ bool should_numa_migrate_memory(struct task_struct *p, struct page * page,
}
static unsigned long weighted_cpuload(const int cpu);
-static unsigned long source_load(int cpu);
static unsigned long target_load(int cpu, int imbalance_pct);
static unsigned long power_of(int cpu);
static long effective_load(struct task_group *tg, int cpu, long wl, long wg);
@@ -3949,27 +3948,15 @@ static void dequeue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-/* Used instead of source_load when we know the type == 0 */
+/* weighted cpu load with runnable time, 'nice' value on CFS class */
static unsigned long weighted_cpuload(const int cpu)
{
return cpu_rq(cpu)->cfs.runnable_load_avg;
}
/*
- * Return a low guess at the load of a migration-source cpu weighted
- * according to the scheduling class and "nice" value.
- *
- * We want to under-estimate the load of migration sources, to
- * balance conservatively.
- */
-static unsigned long source_load(int cpu)
-{
- return weighted_cpuload(cpu);
-}
-
-/*
* Return a high guess at the load of a migration-target cpu weighted
- * according to the scheduling class and "nice" value.
+ * according to the runnable time and "nice" value.
*/
static unsigned long target_load(int cpu, int imbalance_pct)
{
@@ -4297,7 +4284,7 @@ find_idlest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int this_cpu)
for_each_cpu(i, sched_group_cpus(group)) {
/* Bias balancing toward cpus of our domain */
if (local_group)
- load = source_load(i);
+ load = weighted_cpuload(i);
else
load = target_load(i, imbalance);
@@ -5752,7 +5739,7 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
if (local_group && env->idle != CPU_IDLE)
load = target_load(i, bias);
else
- load = source_load(i);
+ load = weighted_cpuload(i);
sgs->group_load += load;
sgs->sum_nr_running += rq->nr_running;
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH 08/11] sched: replace target_load by biased_load
2014-02-25 1:50 [PATCH V4 0/11] sched: remove cpu_loads Alex Shi
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2014-02-25 1:50 ` [PATCH 07/11] sched: replace source_load by weighted_cpuload Alex Shi
@ 2014-02-25 1:50 ` Alex Shi
2014-02-25 1:50 ` [PATCH 09/11] sched: remove rq->cpu_load and rq->nr_load_updates Alex Shi
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Alex Shi @ 2014-02-25 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo, peterz, morten.rasmussen
Cc: vincent.guittot, daniel.lezcano, fweisbec, linux, tony.luck,
fenghua.yu, james.hogan, alex.shi, jason.low2, viresh.kumar,
hanjun.guo, linux-kernel, tglx, akpm, arjan, pjt, fengguang.wu,
linaro-kernel, wangyun, mgorman
There is no source_load now, It is better to change the target_load
function name to original meaning: biased_load.
Suggested-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 5feb51b..b8423dc 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1015,7 +1015,7 @@ bool should_numa_migrate_memory(struct task_struct *p, struct page * page,
}
static unsigned long weighted_cpuload(const int cpu);
-static unsigned long target_load(int cpu, int imbalance_pct);
+static unsigned long biased_load(int cpu, int imbalance_pct);
static unsigned long power_of(int cpu);
static long effective_load(struct task_group *tg, int cpu, long wl, long wg);
@@ -3958,7 +3958,7 @@ static unsigned long weighted_cpuload(const int cpu)
* Return a high guess at the load of a migration-target cpu weighted
* according to the runnable time and "nice" value.
*/
-static unsigned long target_load(int cpu, int imbalance_pct)
+static unsigned long biased_load(int cpu, int imbalance_pct)
{
unsigned long total = weighted_cpuload(cpu);
@@ -4286,7 +4286,7 @@ find_idlest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int this_cpu)
if (local_group)
load = weighted_cpuload(i);
else
- load = target_load(i, imbalance);
+ load = biased_load(i, imbalance);
avg_load += load;
}
@@ -5737,7 +5737,7 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
/* Bias balancing toward cpus of our domain */
if (local_group && env->idle != CPU_IDLE)
- load = target_load(i, bias);
+ load = biased_load(i, bias);
else
load = weighted_cpuload(i);
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH 09/11] sched: remove rq->cpu_load and rq->nr_load_updates
2014-02-25 1:50 [PATCH V4 0/11] sched: remove cpu_loads Alex Shi
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2014-02-25 1:50 ` [PATCH 08/11] sched: replace target_load by biased_load Alex Shi
@ 2014-02-25 1:50 ` Alex Shi
2014-02-25 1:50 ` [PATCH 10/11] sched: rename update_*_cpu_load Alex Shi
2014-02-25 1:50 ` [PATCH 11/11] sched: clean up task_hot function Alex Shi
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Alex Shi @ 2014-02-25 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo, peterz, morten.rasmussen
Cc: vincent.guittot, daniel.lezcano, fweisbec, linux, tony.luck,
fenghua.yu, james.hogan, alex.shi, jason.low2, viresh.kumar,
hanjun.guo, linux-kernel, tglx, akpm, arjan, pjt, fengguang.wu,
linaro-kernel, wangyun, mgorman
The cpu_load is the copy of rq->cfs.runnable_load_avg. And it updated
on time. So we can use the latter directly. Thus saved 2 rq variables:
cpu_load and nr_load_updates.
Then don't need __update_cpu_load(), just keep sched_avg_update().
Thus removed get_rq_runnable_load() which used for update_cpu_load only.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 2 --
kernel/sched/debug.c | 2 --
kernel/sched/proc.c | 55 +++++++++++++---------------------------------------
kernel/sched/sched.h | 2 --
4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index c156c9b..11968df 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -6855,8 +6855,6 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
init_tg_rt_entry(&root_task_group, &rq->rt, NULL, i, NULL);
#endif
-
- rq->cpu_load = 0;
rq->last_load_update_tick = jiffies;
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
index a24d549..83737ce 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
@@ -298,12 +298,10 @@ do { \
SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %lu\n", "load",
rq->load.weight);
P(nr_switches);
- P(nr_load_updates);
P(nr_uninterruptible);
PN(next_balance);
SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %ld\n", "curr->pid", (long)(task_pid_nr(rq->curr)));
PN(clock);
- P(cpu_load);
#undef P
#undef PN
diff --git a/kernel/sched/proc.c b/kernel/sched/proc.c
index 383c4ba..dd3c2d9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/proc.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/proc.c
@@ -8,12 +8,19 @@
#include "sched.h"
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
unsigned long this_cpu_load(void)
{
- struct rq *this = this_rq();
- return this->cpu_load;
+ struct rq *rq = this_rq();
+ return rq->cfs.runnable_load_avg;
}
-
+#else
+unsigned long this_cpu_load(void)
+{
+ struct rq *rq = this_rq();
+ return rq->load.weight;
+}
+#endif
/*
* Global load-average calculations
@@ -398,34 +405,6 @@ static void calc_load_account_active(struct rq *this_rq)
* End of global load-average stuff
*/
-
-/*
- * Update rq->cpu_load statistics. This function is usually called every
- * scheduler tick (TICK_NSEC). With tickless idle this will not be called
- * every tick. We fix it up based on jiffies.
- */
-static void __update_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned long this_load)
-{
- this_rq->nr_load_updates++;
-
- /* Update our load: */
- this_rq->cpu_load = this_load; /* Fasttrack for idx 0 */
-
- sched_avg_update(this_rq);
-}
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-static inline unsigned long get_rq_runnable_load(struct rq *rq)
-{
- return rq->cfs.runnable_load_avg;
-}
-#else
-static inline unsigned long get_rq_runnable_load(struct rq *rq)
-{
- return rq->load.weight;
-}
-#endif
-
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
/*
* There is no sane way to deal with nohz on smp when using jiffies because the
@@ -447,17 +426,15 @@ static inline unsigned long get_rq_runnable_load(struct rq *rq)
void update_idle_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq)
{
unsigned long curr_jiffies = ACCESS_ONCE(jiffies);
- unsigned long load = get_rq_runnable_load(this_rq);
/*
* bail if there's load or we're actually up-to-date.
*/
- if (load || curr_jiffies == this_rq->last_load_update_tick)
+ if (curr_jiffies == this_rq->last_load_update_tick)
return;
this_rq->last_load_update_tick = curr_jiffies;
-
- __update_cpu_load(this_rq, load);
+ sched_avg_update(this_rq);
}
/*
@@ -466,7 +443,6 @@ void update_idle_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq)
void update_cpu_load_nohz(void)
{
struct rq *this_rq = this_rq();
-
update_idle_cpu_load(this_rq);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ */
@@ -476,12 +452,7 @@ void update_cpu_load_nohz(void)
*/
void update_cpu_load_active(struct rq *this_rq)
{
- unsigned long load = get_rq_runnable_load(this_rq);
- /*
- * See the mess around update_idle_cpu_load() / update_cpu_load_nohz().
- */
this_rq->last_load_update_tick = jiffies;
- __update_cpu_load(this_rq, load);
-
+ sched_avg_update(this_rq);
calc_load_account_active(this_rq);
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 30efb79..0213f52 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -516,7 +516,6 @@ struct rq {
unsigned int nr_numa_running;
unsigned int nr_preferred_running;
#endif
- unsigned long cpu_load;
unsigned long last_load_update_tick;
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
u64 nohz_stamp;
@@ -529,7 +528,6 @@ struct rq {
/* capture load from *all* tasks on this cpu: */
struct load_weight load;
- unsigned long nr_load_updates;
u64 nr_switches;
struct cfs_rq cfs;
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH 10/11] sched: rename update_*_cpu_load
2014-02-25 1:50 [PATCH V4 0/11] sched: remove cpu_loads Alex Shi
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2014-02-25 1:50 ` [PATCH 09/11] sched: remove rq->cpu_load and rq->nr_load_updates Alex Shi
@ 2014-02-25 1:50 ` Alex Shi
2014-02-25 1:50 ` [PATCH 11/11] sched: clean up task_hot function Alex Shi
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Alex Shi @ 2014-02-25 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo, peterz, morten.rasmussen
Cc: vincent.guittot, daniel.lezcano, fweisbec, linux, tony.luck,
fenghua.yu, james.hogan, alex.shi, jason.low2, viresh.kumar,
hanjun.guo, linux-kernel, tglx, akpm, arjan, pjt, fengguang.wu,
linaro-kernel, wangyun, mgorman
Since we have no cpu_load update, rename the related functions:
s/update_idle_cpu_load/update_idle_rt_avg/
s/update_cpu_load_nohz/update_rt_avg_nohz/
s/update_cpu_load_active/update_avg_load_active/
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 2 +-
kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
kernel/sched/proc.c | 8 ++++----
kernel/sched/sched.h | 4 ++--
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 2 +-
6 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 60c18de..26727fc 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ extern unsigned long this_cpu_load(void);
extern void calc_global_load(unsigned long ticks);
-extern void update_cpu_load_nohz(void);
+extern void update_rt_avg_nohz(void);
extern unsigned long get_parent_ip(unsigned long addr);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 11968df..d21514c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2431,7 +2431,7 @@ void scheduler_tick(void)
raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
update_rq_clock(rq);
curr->sched_class->task_tick(rq, curr, 0);
- update_cpu_load_active(rq);
+ update_avg_load_active(rq);
raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
perf_event_task_tick();
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index b8423dc..9a0b2aa 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7015,7 +7015,7 @@ static void nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
raw_spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock);
update_rq_clock(rq);
- update_idle_cpu_load(rq);
+ update_idle_rt_avg(rq);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);
rebalance_domains(rq, CPU_IDLE);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/proc.c b/kernel/sched/proc.c
index dd3c2d9..42b7706 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/proc.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/proc.c
@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ static void calc_load_account_active(struct rq *this_rq)
* Called from nohz_idle_balance() to update the load ratings before doing the
* idle balance.
*/
-void update_idle_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq)
+void update_idle_rt_avg(struct rq *this_rq)
{
unsigned long curr_jiffies = ACCESS_ONCE(jiffies);
@@ -440,17 +440,17 @@ void update_idle_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq)
/*
* Called from tick_nohz_idle_exit()
*/
-void update_cpu_load_nohz(void)
+void update_rt_avg_nohz(void)
{
struct rq *this_rq = this_rq();
- update_idle_cpu_load(this_rq);
+ update_idle_rt_avg(this_rq);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ */
/*
* Called from scheduler_tick()
*/
-void update_cpu_load_active(struct rq *this_rq)
+void update_avg_load_active(struct rq *this_rq)
{
this_rq->last_load_update_tick = jiffies;
sched_avg_update(this_rq);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 0213f52..190d694 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ extern unsigned long calc_load_update;
extern atomic_long_t calc_load_tasks;
extern long calc_load_fold_active(struct rq *this_rq);
-extern void update_cpu_load_active(struct rq *this_rq);
+extern void update_avg_load_active(struct rq *this_rq);
/*
* Helpers for converting nanosecond timing to jiffy resolution
@@ -1192,7 +1192,7 @@ extern void init_dl_task_timer(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se);
unsigned long to_ratio(u64 period, u64 runtime);
-extern void update_idle_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq);
+extern void update_idle_rt_avg(struct rq *this_rq);
extern void init_task_runnable_average(struct task_struct *p);
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 9f8af69..b1a400a 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -866,7 +866,7 @@ static void tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(struct tick_sched *ts, ktime_t now)
{
/* Update jiffies first */
tick_do_update_jiffies64(now);
- update_cpu_load_nohz();
+ update_rt_avg_nohz();
calc_load_exit_idle();
touch_softlockup_watchdog();
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH 11/11] sched: clean up task_hot function
2014-02-25 1:50 [PATCH V4 0/11] sched: remove cpu_loads Alex Shi
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2014-02-25 1:50 ` [PATCH 10/11] sched: rename update_*_cpu_load Alex Shi
@ 2014-02-25 1:50 ` Alex Shi
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Alex Shi @ 2014-02-25 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo, peterz, morten.rasmussen
Cc: vincent.guittot, daniel.lezcano, fweisbec, linux, tony.luck,
fenghua.yu, james.hogan, alex.shi, jason.low2, viresh.kumar,
hanjun.guo, linux-kernel, tglx, akpm, arjan, pjt, fengguang.wu,
linaro-kernel, wangyun, mgorman
task_hot doesn't need the 'sched_domain' parameter, so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 9a0b2aa..22e6d8f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5003,7 +5003,7 @@ static void move_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
* Is this task likely cache-hot:
*/
static int
-task_hot(struct task_struct *p, u64 now, struct sched_domain *sd)
+task_hot(struct task_struct *p, u64 now)
{
s64 delta;
@@ -5164,7 +5164,7 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
* 2) task is cache cold, or
* 3) too many balance attempts have failed.
*/
- tsk_cache_hot = task_hot(p, rq_clock_task(env->src_rq), env->sd);
+ tsk_cache_hot = task_hot(p, rq_clock_task(env->src_rq));
if (!tsk_cache_hot)
tsk_cache_hot = migrate_degrades_locality(p, env);
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread