From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_pkg_temp_thermal: Do not expose as a hwmon device
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 09:44:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53136E00.2030000@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140302180452.73fa2f8a@endymion.delvare>
On 03/02/2014 09:04 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 08:03:28 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 03/02/2014 06:33 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
>>> The temperature value reported by x86_pkg_temp_thermal is already
>>> reported by the coretemp driver. So, do not expose this thermal zone
>>> as a hwmon device, because it would be redundant.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
>>> Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>>
>> Does that make the "Fix thermal zone type" patch unnecessary ?
>
> I think both patches are needed, as type "pkg-temp-0" is wrong anyway,
> regardless of the hwmon side of things. But it is less important with
> this patch applied, indeed.
>
>> If so, this patch would be a candidate for stable.
>
> I'm still not 100% certain we want either patch in stable. After all,
> they aren't fixing any critical bug, and they change user interfaces so
> they could impact some users in unpredictable ways.
>
Ok.
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-02 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-02 14:33 [PATCH] x86_pkg_temp_thermal: Do not expose as a hwmon device Jean Delvare
2014-03-02 16:03 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-03-02 17:04 ` Jean Delvare
2014-03-02 17:44 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2014-03-07 8:07 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53136E00.2030000@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=eduardo.valentin@ti.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.