From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43603) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKI98-0002Mx-KB for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 20:58:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKI91-00006j-AX for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 20:58:22 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-f177.google.com ([209.85.192.177]:33509) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKI91-00006X-40 for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 20:58:15 -0500 Received: by mail-pd0-f177.google.com with SMTP id g10so3046143pdj.22 for ; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 17:58:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5313E1AD.5050409@ozlabs.ru> Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 12:58:05 +1100 From: Alexey Kardashevskiy MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6777CD901FD53644B082307CD745FB8326AC9348@SACEXCMBX02-PRD.hq.netapp.com> <530AC892.2080109@ozlabs.ru> <5311D2DD.4090904@ozlabs.ru> <531251CB.10102@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <531251CB.10102@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] e1000 memory corruption in guest OS List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , "Hoyer, David" , "Qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Cc: "Moyer, Keith" , "Best, Tish" On 03/02/2014 08:31 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 01/03/2014 13:30, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: >>> > >>> > Corrupted DMA buffer is 0x e00000 -- 0x7f15c313f000. >>> > The e1000 packet is at 0x12ffac2 -- 0x7f15c313eac2. >>> > >>> > (0x7f15c313f000 - 0x7f15c313eac2) = 0x53e which is less than 0x5aa and >>> > (0x5aa - 0x53e) = 0x6c bytes get corrupted. >>> > >>> > I see here buffer overrun from e1000 and I suspect that your patch just >>> > hides this problem. What did I miss? >> >> Ping, anyone? > > You missed that this is a Xen-specific problem. Xen maps things a page at > a time, so address_space_map/unmap/rw can operate only on a small part of > the requested [address, address+length) range. Sorry, I am not following you here. Does KVM map things not page-aligned? > So there is no overrun in e1000. The patch is incomplete, because it fixes > only address_space_rw, but the problem is indeed in exec.c. So you know what the problem is? We have a bunch of bugreports against e1000 breaking things... -- Alexey