Re: WARNING: Failed to fetch URL http://downloads.sourceforge.net/openjade/openjade-0.6.14.tar.gz, attempting MIRRORS if available

[Alex J Lennon <ajlennon@dynamicdevices.co.uk>]

On 03/03/2014 16:27, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Monday 03 March 2014 14:53:26 Alex J Lennon wrote:
>> On 03/03/2014 14:36, Rick Bianchi wrote:
>>> Does anyone know how I can get around this error? There is no such
>>> package on sourceforge "Fetcher failure for URL:
>>> 'http://downloads.sourceforge.net/openjade/openjade-0.6.14.tar.gz'.
>>> Unable to fetch URL from any source."
>> Rick, as Paul mentioned there seems to be something really strange going on.
>>
>> If you look in the docbook-utils-native recipe (which is at r3 for me in
>> master:d6596f5e0446b6aa3ae845389965bb2852f17b65) it is 0.6.14
>>
>> That recipe doesn't use the openjade tarball although it has a
>> dependency on openjade-native
>>
>> If you look at the openjade-native recipe it is at version 1.3.2
>>
>> So, you'd expect docbook-utils-native to be pulling down a 0.6.14
>> docbook tarball, or if you were building openjade-native you'd expect
>> the openjade 1.3.2 tarball to be pulled down (I believe)
>>
>> So it looks as though somehow there's some kind of corruption that is
>> mixing up openjade with the 0.6.14 of docbook for some reason.
>>
>> i.e. I don't believe you're going to find a tarball of an
>> openjade-0.6.14 release.
> This is my assessment of what's happening also. I can't understand how this 
> could ever happen, but it looks like SRC_URI is being mixed up between the two 
> recipes, and this is on the dylan (old stable) branch as well.
>
>> It might be better to try checkout out your layers again and doing a
>> rebuild from scratch ?
> Before doing this, Rick could you run the following and post the output:
>
> bitbake -e docbook-utils-native | grep ^SRC_URI=

The other thought that came to mind is that you might disable all the
other layers in your bblayers configuration file, and try building
docbook-utils-native

That at least would isolate whether there's some odd layer interaction
going on.

Cheers, Alex

> Thanks,
> Paul
>