From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@citrix.com>,
Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add a "make rpmball" target
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 16:36:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5314AF8A.2070301@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5314AF0C.6080708@eu.citrix.com>
On 03/03/2014 04:34 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 03/03/2014 04:23 PM, Olaf Hering wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 03, George Dunlap wrote:
>>
>>
>>> +%install
>>> +rm -rf \$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
>>> +mkdir -p \$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
>> Newer rpms are supposed to do that automatically, but I dont know what
>> "newer" actually means. And certainly it does not hurt to keep this.
>>
>>> +cd %{_xenroot}
>>> +dist/install.sh \$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/
>>> +
>>> +cd \$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
>>> +
>>> +# Don't include xen-syms
>>> +rm -f boot/xen-syms*
>>> +# Remove all the "linked" xen-*.gz files
>>> +rm -f \$(find boot/ -type l)
>> "find $paht -type l -delete"?
>
> Ack.
>
>>
>>> +%files
>>> +%defattr(-,root,root,-)
>>> +/*
>> In this case, to avoid package conflicts, add some tags like:
>>
>> Obsoletes: xen-libs
>> Obsoletes: xen-tools
>
> What exactly would this be for?
"remove another named package(s) when this package is installed" -- I
think that's a bit more than we want in the rpmball. I'd much rather
the developer have to remove the conflicting packages themselves, rather
than have it done automatically.
-George
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-03 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-03 14:59 [PATCH] Add a "make rpmball" target George Dunlap
2014-03-03 16:07 ` George Dunlap
2014-03-03 22:34 ` Don Slutz
2014-03-03 23:08 ` Don Slutz
2014-03-03 23:37 ` M A Young
2014-03-03 23:46 ` Don Slutz
2014-03-03 23:52 ` M A Young
2014-03-04 10:26 ` George Dunlap
2014-03-03 16:23 ` Olaf Hering
2014-03-03 16:34 ` George Dunlap
2014-03-03 16:36 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2014-03-03 17:31 ` Olaf Hering
2014-03-03 17:23 ` Olaf Hering
2014-03-03 17:27 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-03-03 17:30 ` George Dunlap
2014-03-03 17:59 ` Ian Jackson
2014-03-03 22:53 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-03-03 23:11 ` Olaf Hering
2014-03-04 12:19 ` Ian Jackson
2014-03-03 18:19 ` Ian Campbell
2014-03-03 23:06 ` Olaf Hering
2014-03-03 20:51 ` Don Slutz
2014-03-04 11:41 ` George Dunlap
2014-03-03 22:52 ` Dario Faggioli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5314AF8A.2070301@eu.citrix.com \
--to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@citrix.com \
--cc=olaf@aepfle.de \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.