From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41517)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sw@weilnetz.de>) id 1WKjIq-00037J-EZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 01:58:18 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sw@weilnetz.de>) id 1WKjIk-00089S-Ea
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 01:58:12 -0500
Received: from v220110690675601.yourvserver.net ([37.221.199.173]:37771)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sw@weilnetz.de>) id 1WKjIk-00089K-8Y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 01:58:06 -0500
Message-ID: <5315796B.4050001@weilnetz.de>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 07:57:47 +0100
From: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFEAcA8aEdntMxibVvTn7P3iZV=hFpWpSAqH=XQqwcu1yt1CYA@mail.gmail.com>
	<530F98A2.8040600@weilnetz.de> <530FB326.9080602@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA-jAiXYJwFNaP-Bbiuv47QQaGDiNNTUvjSXYHTbEFPgRg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFEAcA_DnaGr52onn9C8WE4wUuE4nJe78u+vcKUFKXRa8+4gNw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_DnaGr52onn9C8WE4wUuE4nJe78u+vcKUFKXRa8+4gNw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] git build from clean broken?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

Am 04.03.2014 00:50, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> 
> Do we have a definite version of this fix which everybody is happy
> with yet? I've got confused with the various versions and review
> comments on them. I'd like to apply the buildfix before I apply
> any further pull requests...
> 
> thanks
> -- PMM

Simply take the version without confusing review comments:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/324909/. :-)

To be honest: the other patch fixes one build regression and introduces
a new one, so it would not improve the situation.

Paolo noticed that Makefile is a mess in some parts, and I agree. But
that is something which can be handled separately.

Regards
Stefan