From: "Thomas Bächler" <thomas@archlinux.org>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>
Cc: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@padovan.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>,
linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
"Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "Bluetooth: Use devname:vhci module alias for virtual HCI driver"
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 19:48:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53177187.3040009@archlinux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <424A74F3-7646-449C-9F72-A0F4E9A28551@holtmann.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1427 bytes --]
Am 05.03.2014 19:36, schrieb Marcel Holtmann:
>>>> This reverts commit bfacbb9aec029b3200053d84c8cd5d7575f2d4a5.
>>>
>>> NAK. We allocated a static minor for this.
>>
>> Johan mentioned that. Commit b075dd40c95d11c2c8690f6c4d6232fc,
>> correct?
I am sorry Marcel, I only looked at the Linus tree, not at bluetooth or
bluetooth-next. This commit should indeed fix the problem. Disregard my
patch.
> Why isn't that headed into 3.14 right now, and CC'd to
>> stable? Currently you have a somewhat broken driver in 3.13 and
>> 3.14-rcX that seems to have a pretty clear fix.
>
> somewhat broken? kmod prints this as an error, but it is not a regression in user functionality. The driver works just as before. The error message can be ignored.
It's a regression in my sanity, since numerous users blame all kernel
bugs on this error message and I am tired of explaining the situation
(problem + error message == problem found *sigh*). I only sent this
patch since I hadn't found the correct fix.
> So if anybody feels strongly that the static device node assignment should be put into -stable, then I am fine with it. However I do not see this as passing requirement for a -stable fix since it is really not affecting anyone (minus the misleading message from kmod).
Since b075dd4 will end up in the Linus tree eventually, I have no
trouble backporting it myself.
Sorry for the disturbance.
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 901 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-05 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-05 11:59 [PATCH] Revert "Bluetooth: Use devname:vhci module alias for virtual HCI driver" Thomas Bächler
2014-03-05 15:28 ` Josh Boyer
2014-03-05 15:28 ` Josh Boyer
2014-03-05 16:11 ` Johan Hedberg
2014-03-05 16:46 ` Marcel Holtmann
2014-03-05 17:50 ` Josh Boyer
2014-03-05 18:36 ` Marcel Holtmann
2014-03-05 18:48 ` Thomas Bächler [this message]
2014-03-05 18:53 ` Josh Boyer
2014-03-05 18:53 ` Josh Boyer
2014-03-05 19:02 ` Marcel Holtmann
2014-03-18 11:34 ` Lucas De Marchi
2014-03-18 11:34 ` Lucas De Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53177187.3040009@archlinux.org \
--to=thomas@archlinux.org \
--cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
--cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
--cc=jwboyer@fedoraproject.org \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.