From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([70.85.31.133]:43163 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751931AbaCEVzp (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Mar 2014 16:55:45 -0500 Message-ID: <53179D5D.4070303@wwwdotorg.org> Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 14:55:41 -0700 From: Stephen Warren MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lucas Stach , Bjorn Helgaas CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Jingoo Han , Simon Horman , Shawn Guo , Ben Dooks , Kukjin Kim , Thierry Reding , Arnd Bergmann , kernel@pengutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] ARM: dts: tegra: add PCIe interrupt mapping properties References: <1394025951-32438-1-git-send-email-l.stach@pengutronix.de> <1394025951-32438-2-git-send-email-l.stach@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <1394025951-32438-2-git-send-email-l.stach@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/05/2014 06:25 AM, Lucas Stach wrote: > Those are defined by the common PCI binding. It sounds like there's no dependency between pathces 1/6 and 2/6, so I should apply 1/6 to the Tegra tree, and Bjorn apply 2/6 to the PCI tree? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] ARM: dts: tegra: add PCIe interrupt mapping properties Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 14:55:41 -0700 Message-ID: <53179D5D.4070303@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1394025951-32438-1-git-send-email-l.stach@pengutronix.de> <1394025951-32438-2-git-send-email-l.stach@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1394025951-32438-2-git-send-email-l.stach-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Lucas Stach , Bjorn Helgaas Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-sh-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-samsung-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Jingoo Han , Simon Horman , Shawn Guo , Ben Dooks , Kukjin Kim , Thierry Reding , Arnd Bergmann , kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org On 03/05/2014 06:25 AM, Lucas Stach wrote: > Those are defined by the common PCI binding. It sounds like there's no dependency between pathces 1/6 and 2/6, so I should apply 1/6 to the Tegra tree, and Bjorn apply 2/6 to the PCI tree? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 21:55:41 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] ARM: dts: tegra: add PCIe interrupt mapping properties Message-Id: <53179D5D.4070303@wwwdotorg.org> List-Id: References: <1394025951-32438-1-git-send-email-l.stach@pengutronix.de> <1394025951-32438-2-git-send-email-l.stach@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <1394025951-32438-2-git-send-email-l.stach@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On 03/05/2014 06:25 AM, Lucas Stach wrote: > Those are defined by the common PCI binding. It sounds like there's no dependency between pathces 1/6 and 2/6, so I should apply 1/6 to the Tegra tree, and Bjorn apply 2/6 to the PCI tree? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren) Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 14:55:41 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v2 1/6] ARM: dts: tegra: add PCIe interrupt mapping properties In-Reply-To: <1394025951-32438-2-git-send-email-l.stach@pengutronix.de> References: <1394025951-32438-1-git-send-email-l.stach@pengutronix.de> <1394025951-32438-2-git-send-email-l.stach@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <53179D5D.4070303@wwwdotorg.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 03/05/2014 06:25 AM, Lucas Stach wrote: > Those are defined by the common PCI binding. It sounds like there's no dependency between pathces 1/6 and 2/6, so I should apply 1/6 to the Tegra tree, and Bjorn apply 2/6 to the PCI tree?