diff for duplicates of <5317D387.3000708@ti.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index cd2e77c..ca7aeb0 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ On Wednesday 05 March 2014 05:55 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: >> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/14/703 > -> The Freescale QorIQ Devices have a Queue Manager (QMan) as part of their Data Path Architecture (DPAA). I haven?t looked at the QMTM from APM, but not sure if mailbox is the best place for these things. They seem so much more involved than what I?m guessing most people are thinking with mailbox. +> The Freescale QorIQ Devices have a Queue Manager (QMan) as part of their Data Path Architecture (DPAA). I haven’t looked at the QMTM from APM, but not sure if mailbox is the best place for these things. They seem so much more involved than what I’m guessing most people are thinking with mailbox. > I also felt that even for APM case mailbox may not be the right subsystem but seems like the whole QMTM is based on message passing and thats why Arnd suggested the drives/mailbox diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 7a6bf63..ade4122 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -3,10 +3,21 @@ "ref\0AAE2808F-A2C8-4031-BFA4-1A20B182EA69@codeaurora.org\0" "ref\053169036.9060808@ti.com\0" "ref\00817AD72-FBD0-4DB0-86C7-6C8EAC84BAA2@codeaurora.org\0" - "From\0santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH 2/3] soc: keystone: add QMSS driver\0" + "From\0Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 2/3] soc: keystone: add QMSS driver\0" "Date\0Thu, 6 Mar 2014 09:46:47 +0800\0" - "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>\0" + "Cc\0Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>" + devicetree@vger.kernel.org <devicetree@vger.kernel.org> + Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> + Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> + Nair + Sandeep <sandeep_n@ti.com> + Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> + Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> + Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> + " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Wednesday 05 March 2014 05:55 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:\n" @@ -94,7 +105,7 @@ "\n" ">> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/14/703\n" "> \n" - "> The Freescale QorIQ Devices have a Queue Manager (QMan) as part of their Data Path Architecture (DPAA). I haven?t looked at the QMTM from APM, but not sure if mailbox is the best place for these things. They seem so much more involved than what I?m guessing most people are thinking with mailbox.\n" + "> The Freescale QorIQ Devices have a Queue Manager (QMan) as part of their Data Path Architecture (DPAA). I haven\342\200\231t looked at the QMTM from APM, but not sure if mailbox is the best place for these things. They seem so much more involved than what I\342\200\231m guessing most people are thinking with mailbox.\n" "> \n" "I also felt that even for APM case mailbox may not be the right subsystem but seems like\n" "the whole QMTM is based on message passing and thats why Arnd suggested the drives/mailbox\n" @@ -112,4 +123,4 @@ "Regards,\n" Santosh -95f7561758412d14f27900775aeda74c8d1caeeca568d4003900d8a362b25e8d +ea4de58833a931be842a3a2ffb5d2dfe33199cfc3a6db81b5c363be43e672b89
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index cd2e77c..ca7aeb0 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ On Wednesday 05 March 2014 05:55 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: >> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/14/703 > -> The Freescale QorIQ Devices have a Queue Manager (QMan) as part of their Data Path Architecture (DPAA). I haven?t looked at the QMTM from APM, but not sure if mailbox is the best place for these things. They seem so much more involved than what I?m guessing most people are thinking with mailbox. +> The Freescale QorIQ Devices have a Queue Manager (QMan) as part of their Data Path Architecture (DPAA). I haven’t looked at the QMTM from APM, but not sure if mailbox is the best place for these things. They seem so much more involved than what I’m guessing most people are thinking with mailbox. > I also felt that even for APM case mailbox may not be the right subsystem but seems like the whole QMTM is based on message passing and thats why Arnd suggested the drives/mailbox diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 7a6bf63..9d9835e 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -3,10 +3,21 @@ "ref\0AAE2808F-A2C8-4031-BFA4-1A20B182EA69@codeaurora.org\0" "ref\053169036.9060808@ti.com\0" "ref\00817AD72-FBD0-4DB0-86C7-6C8EAC84BAA2@codeaurora.org\0" - "From\0santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH 2/3] soc: keystone: add QMSS driver\0" + "From\0Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 2/3] soc: keystone: add QMSS driver\0" "Date\0Thu, 6 Mar 2014 09:46:47 +0800\0" - "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>\0" + "Cc\0Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>" + devicetree@vger.kernel.org <devicetree@vger.kernel.org> + Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> + Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> + Nair + Sandeep <sandeep_n@ti.com> + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> + Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> + Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> + Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> + " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Wednesday 05 March 2014 05:55 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:\n" @@ -94,7 +105,7 @@ "\n" ">> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/14/703\n" "> \n" - "> The Freescale QorIQ Devices have a Queue Manager (QMan) as part of their Data Path Architecture (DPAA). I haven?t looked at the QMTM from APM, but not sure if mailbox is the best place for these things. They seem so much more involved than what I?m guessing most people are thinking with mailbox.\n" + "> The Freescale QorIQ Devices have a Queue Manager (QMan) as part of their Data Path Architecture (DPAA). I haven\342\200\231t looked at the QMTM from APM, but not sure if mailbox is the best place for these things. They seem so much more involved than what I\342\200\231m guessing most people are thinking with mailbox.\n" "> \n" "I also felt that even for APM case mailbox may not be the right subsystem but seems like\n" "the whole QMTM is based on message passing and thats why Arnd suggested the drives/mailbox\n" @@ -112,4 +123,4 @@ "Regards,\n" Santosh -95f7561758412d14f27900775aeda74c8d1caeeca568d4003900d8a362b25e8d +2483d6b5435377d96c925cb0d84f2a5116c36f1d5b1a7d971efbd94a7818213e
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.