From: Michael D <me@md-5.net>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Addition of packages: libvirt & qemu (target)
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 17:44:42 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5318195A.5020104@md-5.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5316C8CD.7010806@mind.be>
> Just out of curiosity, what is your use case for qemu on the target?
> IIRC for Yann is was just a let's-see-if-it-can-be-done hack, that's why
> he never pushed it anymore. I can imagine borderline buildroot uses which
> have lxr or docker on the target, but full-fledged qemu?
Couple QEMU with an x86_64 host and KVM, suddenly buildroot becomes a
minimal hypervisor in a box. Now lets imagine we insert a buildroot USB
/ CD into a server.
The server loads the entire system into 40mb of its memory, grabs an IP
and configuration parameters via dhcp, a small embedded binary reads
these settings, looks at what VMs are stored on the server and starts
running them. You can effectively make buildroot a quick way to spin up
ultra efficient and slim hypervisors.
> You can typically also pass in LIBS="-lm" to configure.
I'll try rebuilding my toolchain with ulibc and passing -lm to
configure. Hopefully that turns out well - is there a quick way to do
this with an autotools .mk?
> - more autobuilder instances;
Let me know what you need for that / what it entails.
Thanks
Michael
On 05/03/14 17:48, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> On 03/03/14 10:48, Michael D wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> First up, thanks for buildroot, its a really cool tool, and I've enjoyed
>> using it thus far. After some discussion on IRC with y_morin, I'd like to
>> put forward that the libvirt package is added, and that qemu is adapted
>> to support being installed on the target as well.
> Just out of curiosity, what is your use case for qemu on the target?
> IIRC for Yann is was just a let's-see-if-it-can-be-done hack, that's why
> he never pushed it anymore. I can imagine borderline buildroot uses which
> have lxr or docker on the target, but full-fledged qemu?
>
>
>> libvirt is a fairly
>> standard autotools package, and shouldn't require much work, although I
>> did notice ./configure checked for some host qemu binaries.
>>
>> You can see Yann's work on libvirt and target-qemu here:
>> https://gitorious.org/buildroot/buildroot/source/e09cf6e8d412cfd6163358fc7f58c83f44cc0a38:package/libvirt
>>
>> https://gitorious.org/buildroot/buildroot/source/14ac053363188981cf7fb78b589a9e27fb464483:package/qemu
>>
>>
>> and my inexperienced, hackjob work over here, updates the packages to
>> their latest versions and removes unneeded depends:
>> https://github.com/md-5/Multiplicity/tree/master/package
>>
>> libvirt requires the following depends to work:
>>
>> host-pkgconf lvm2 libnl libxml2 yajl
>>
>> In order for the configure script to detect yajl properly, it needs a
>> (e)glibc toolchain. This is due to yajl requiring -lm, which is not
>> linked into the test binary. A better solution than requiring (e)glibc
>> would be to patch libvirt's ./configure to link in -lm for the yajl test.
> You can typically also pass in LIBS="-lm" to configure.
>
>> Yann's work on libvirt also depends on
>>
>> libgcrypt and gnutls
>>
>> which I assume add extra features. Ideally libvirt's depend section
>> should be updated if these (and any other feature enhancing) packages are
>> selected.
>>
>> Building Qemu for the target on the other hand is quite a bit more
>> complex due to the sheer number of configuration options available. In
>> particular it depends on a x86 based toolchain with threads, and
>>
>> host-pkgconf host-python libglib2 pixman
>>
>> I'm reasonably sure Qemu can compile and run on other arches, however
>> Yann has not included support for this. Ideally the final package in
>> buildroot would only require these 4 libraries to build, additional
>> depends and features should be added with their necessary options and
>> installed if desired (util-linux, some sound libraries, and a lot of
>> graphics libraries for jpg/png manipulation).
>>
>> Anyway, enough of me talking, it would be great to see these two packages
>> become properly integrated into buildroot, and I am hoping someone can
>> manage it.
>>
>> If it helps sweeten the deal, I'll be more than happy to donate some beer
>> money to the successful contributors, or donate to the buildroot project.
>> I'll also be more than happy to make sure these packages stay updated and
>> working.
> We don't really have a way for accepting donations, but what we could
> use is:
>
> - more autobuilder instances;
>
> - sponsoring for the buildroot developer meeting.
>
>
> Regards,
> Arnout
>
>
>> Thanks
>> Michael Dardis
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> buildroot mailing list
>> buildroot at busybox.net
>> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-06 6:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-03 9:48 [Buildroot] Addition of packages: libvirt & qemu (target) Michael D
2014-03-05 6:48 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2014-03-06 6:44 ` Michael D [this message]
2014-03-06 8:15 ` Jeremy Rosen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5318195A.5020104@md-5.net \
--to=me@md-5.net \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.