All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH][v4] powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT- Add secure boot target for B4860QDS
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 10:30:52 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <531A105C.3070003@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394198592-18967-1-git-send-email-aneesh.bansal@freescale.com>

On 03/07/2014 05:23 AM, Aneesh Bansal wrote:
> Changes:
> 1. L2 cache is being invalidated by Boot ROM code for e6500 core.
>    So removing the invalidation from start.S
> 2. Clear the LAW and corresponding configuration for CPC. Boot ROM
>    code uses it as hosekeeping area.
> 3. For Secure boot, CPC is configured as SRAM and used as house
>    keeping area. This configuration is to be disabled once in uboot.
>    Earlier this disabling of CPC as SRAM was happening in cpu_init_r.
>    As a result cache invalidation function was getting skipped in
>    case CPC is configured as SRAM.This was causing random crashes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal <aneesh.bansal@freescale.com>
> ---
>  README                                     |  4 ++++
>  arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init.c        | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/start.S           |  3 ++-
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/fsl_secure_boot.h |  6 ++++++
>  boards.cfg                                 |  1 +
>  5 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> Changes from v3:
> Renamed the macro to indicate CPC configured as SRAM at U-boot entry to
> CONFIG_SYS_CPC_SRAM 

Aneesh,

I understand you are trying to address the comment about when CPC needs to be
disabled before initializing as normal CPC. But introducing CONFIG_SYS_CPC_SRAM
seems even more confusing. Let's take one step back.

CPC as SRAM can be used for many reasons. There is only one reason we should
keep it as SRAM, i.e. u-boot is indeed using SRAM as its final destination. For
all other usages, we can safely reconfigure it as normal CPC after u-boot
relocates itself into DDR. If u-boot's final destination is SRAM, it is a
RAMBOOT. Can we use this condition to deal with CPC?

Do you see the need to disable CPC before relocation? You are doing so in this
patch. Does the temporary LAW or address conflict with u-boot?

York

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-07 18:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-07 13:23 [U-Boot] [PATCH][v4] powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT- Add secure boot target for B4860QDS Aneesh Bansal
2014-03-07 18:30 ` York Sun [this message]
2014-03-07 18:54   ` Scott Wood
2014-03-07 18:58     ` York Sun
2014-03-07 19:00       ` Scott Wood
2014-03-07 19:07         ` York Sun
2014-03-10 23:24           ` Scott Wood
2014-03-11  2:46             ` York Sun
2014-03-10  9:14   ` aneesh.bansal at freescale.com
2014-03-10 15:38     ` York Sun
2014-03-10 23:55       ` Scott Wood
2014-03-11  0:00         ` York Sun
2014-03-11  8:43           ` aneesh.bansal at freescale.com
2014-03-07 18:43 ` Scott Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=531A105C.3070003@freescale.com \
    --to=yorksun@freescale.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.