From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: wharms-fPG8STNUNVg@public.gmane.org
Cc: "linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.orglinux-man
<linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Bug 60749 - Do not need to link against -lm for fabs*()
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:25:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <531DBD47.6010902@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52371C48.7040404-fPG8STNUNVg@public.gmane.org>
Walter,
On 09/16/2013 04:57 PM, walter harms wrote:
>
>
> Am 14.09.2013 14:05, schrieb walter harms:
>>
>>
>> Am 13.09.2013 20:20, schrieb Michael Kerrisk (man-pages):
>>> Walter,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:46 PM, walter harms <wharms-fPG8STNUNVg@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>>> hi list,
>>>> i was investigating this and the good news it that you still need a libm.
>>>> On the other side the reporter is right he does not need to specify that.
>>>> Obviously this depends on the linker script used.
>>>>
>>>> The math man pages say: "Link with -lm".
>>>> Perhaps it is better to say 'You may need to Link with -lm".
>>>>
>>>> any comments on that ?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for looking at this bug. Could you elaborate a little more on
>>> what it/sin't in the linker script that makes the difference?
>>>
>>
>> I have no clue what linker magic is needed.
>>
> I know what it going on. the is no linker magic required.
> The point is gcc build-ins. Some functions are replaced with
> build-ins. That happens e.g. with fabs() what the original poster noted.
> Disabling the build-ins with gcc -fno-builtin shows that the -lm is still
> a requirement.
Thanks! I hadn't thought of that. I see there is a list available in
the gcc documentation at http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Other-Builtins.html
> next problem, who will do the bugzilla-entry ?
I will add something to https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60749
Fundamentally, this is a gcc feature, and I don't think there's much that
can be sensibly said about it in man-pages.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-10 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-13 16:46 RFC: Bug 60749 - Do not need to link against -lm for fabs*() walter harms
[not found] ` <5233415A.90506-fPG8STNUNVg@public.gmane.org>
2013-09-13 18:20 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
[not found] ` <CAKgNAkiy54SbGEt6KQ2a87SQejoyuzcTvDbVK8aAQXd==yNNvg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2013-09-14 12:05 ` walter harms
[not found] ` <5234511C.7030500-fPG8STNUNVg@public.gmane.org>
2013-09-16 14:57 ` walter harms
[not found] ` <52371C48.7040404-fPG8STNUNVg@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-10 13:25 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=531DBD47.6010902@gmail.com \
--to=mtk.manpages-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.orglinux-man \
--cc=wharms-fPG8STNUNVg@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.