From: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@linux-m68k.org>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] serial_core: Unregister console in uart_remove_one_port()
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 03:43:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <531E865B.9090707@hurleysoftware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <531E61AC.6040706@hurleysoftware.com>
On 03/10/2014 09:06 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> [ +cc Alan ]
>
> On 02/28/2014 08:21 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@linux-m68k.org>
>>
>> If the serial port being removed is used as a console, it must also be
>> unregistered from the console subsystem using unregister_console().
>>
>> uart_ops.release_port() will release resources (e.g. iounmap() the serial
>> port registers), causing a crash on subsequent kernel output if the console
>> is still registered.
>
> This brings up an interesting point: where are the serial_core drivers
> indicating to the tty core that the port is bound to a console?
> IOW, I cannot find a single 'port->console = 1' anywhere in the serial tree.
Answering half my own question: I see that serial_core doesn't use
tty_port_shutdown() but rather has it's own uart_shutdown() equivalent, and
thus doesn't use 'port->console'.
Ok.
But I still don't see what prevents a uart_port_shutdown() on a running
serial console.
Regards,
Peter Hurley
> It would be bad if the uart port disappears while a console is running
> on it...
>
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@linux-m68k.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
>> index ece2049bd270..8ece7f14d89d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
>> @@ -2677,6 +2677,12 @@ int uart_remove_one_port(struct uart_driver *drv, struct uart_port *uport)
>> tty_vhangup(port->tty);
>>
>> /*
>> + * If the port is used as a console, unregister it
>> + */
>> + if (uart_console(uport))
>> + unregister_console(uport->cons);
>> +
>> + /*
>> * Free the port IO and memory resources, if any.
>> */
>> if (uport->type != PORT_UNKNOWN)
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@linux-m68k.org>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] serial_core: Unregister console in uart_remove_one_port()
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 23:43:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <531E865B.9090707@hurleysoftware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <531E61AC.6040706@hurleysoftware.com>
On 03/10/2014 09:06 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> [ +cc Alan ]
>
> On 02/28/2014 08:21 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@linux-m68k.org>
>>
>> If the serial port being removed is used as a console, it must also be
>> unregistered from the console subsystem using unregister_console().
>>
>> uart_ops.release_port() will release resources (e.g. iounmap() the serial
>> port registers), causing a crash on subsequent kernel output if the console
>> is still registered.
>
> This brings up an interesting point: where are the serial_core drivers
> indicating to the tty core that the port is bound to a console?
> IOW, I cannot find a single 'port->console = 1' anywhere in the serial tree.
Answering half my own question: I see that serial_core doesn't use
tty_port_shutdown() but rather has it's own uart_shutdown() equivalent, and
thus doesn't use 'port->console'.
Ok.
But I still don't see what prevents a uart_port_shutdown() on a running
serial console.
Regards,
Peter Hurley
> It would be bad if the uart port disappears while a console is running
> on it...
>
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@linux-m68k.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
>> index ece2049bd270..8ece7f14d89d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
>> @@ -2677,6 +2677,12 @@ int uart_remove_one_port(struct uart_driver *drv, struct uart_port *uport)
>> tty_vhangup(port->tty);
>>
>> /*
>> + * If the port is used as a console, unregister it
>> + */
>> + if (uart_console(uport))
>> + unregister_console(uport->cons);
>> +
>> + /*
>> * Free the port IO and memory resources, if any.
>> */
>> if (uport->type != PORT_UNKNOWN)
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-11 3:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-28 13:21 [PATCH 1/2] serial_core: Unregister console in uart_remove_one_port() Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-02-28 13:21 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-02-28 13:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] serial: sh-sci: Add missing call to uart_remove_one_port() in failure path Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-02-28 13:21 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-03-06 4:19 ` Simon Horman
2014-03-06 4:19 ` Simon Horman
2014-03-06 4:34 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-03-06 4:34 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-03-11 1:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] serial_core: Unregister console in uart_remove_one_port() Peter Hurley
2014-03-11 1:06 ` Peter Hurley
2014-03-11 3:43 ` Peter Hurley [this message]
2014-03-11 3:43 ` Peter Hurley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=531E865B.9090707@hurleysoftware.com \
--to=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.