From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Dichtel Subject: Re: Question on multicast. Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:06:00 +0100 Message-ID: <53205BB8.6020406@6wind.com> References: <531F85BF.10504@candelatech.com> Reply-To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE To: Ben Greear , netdev Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com ([74.125.82.177]:61500 "EHLO mail-we0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753228AbaCLNGD (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Mar 2014 09:06:03 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id u57so10962625wes.8 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 06:06:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <531F85BF.10504@candelatech.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le 11/03/2014 22:53, Ben Greear a =E9crit : > Is it sane to have multiple multicast transmitters using same IGMP gr= oup > and destination port in the same routed network? I think there is no fundamental problem. It depends on what you want to= do ;-) Listeners can filter by source address if they need. Regards, Nicolas