From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35736) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WNqe6-0000za-8z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 17:25:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WNqe0-0004W9-4G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 17:25:02 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:57633) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WNqdz-0004W4-PH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 17:24:56 -0400 Message-ID: <5320D11F.3060703@caramail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 22:26:55 +0100 From: Olivier Danet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] sparc32 : Signed integer division overflow List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel , Blue Swirl , Mark Cave-Ayland I wanted to test an integer divider for SPARC32, and tried the stress test program on QEMU, which choked on the division -0x8000_0000_0000_0000 / -1 (QEMU compiled on x86_64). Excerpt from the test program : ------------------------------------------------------------------- #include typedef unsigned uint32; typedef unsigned long long uint64; typedef signed int32; typedef signed long long int64; void sdiv(int64 x, int32 y, int32 *q, uint32 *ov) { uint32 a,b,c,d,e; a=x>>32; b=x; c=y; __asm__ __volatile__("wr %2,%%y\n\t" "nop\n\t" "nop\n\t" "nop\n\t" "sdivcc %3,%4,%0\n\t" "or %%r0,0,%1\n\t" "bvc xxa\n\t" "nop\n\t" "add %1,1,%1\n\t" "xxa:bpos xxb\n\t" "nop\n\t" "add %1,2,%1\n\t" "xxb:bne xxc\n\t" "nop\n\t" "add %1,4,%1\n\t" "xxc:nop\n\t" : "=r"(d),"=r"(e):"r"(a),"r"(b),"r"(c) ); *q=d; *ov=e & 1; } void main(void) { uint64 x; uint32 y; int32 q; int32 ov; x = 1LL << 63; y = -1; sdiv(x, y, &q, &ov); } Here is a patch for handling this corner case on SPARC32. SPARC64 division already checks this in helper_sdivx(), some other architectures seem to do the same (for example, target-arm/helper.c: HELPER(sdiv)) =================================================================== The integer division 0x8000_0000_0000_0000 / -1 must be handled separately to avoid overflows on the QEMU host. Signed-off-by: Olivier Danet ------------------------------------------------------------------- diff --git a/target-sparc/helper.c b/target-sparc/helper.c index 57c20af..b6b5937 100644 --- a/target-sparc/helper.c +++ b/target-sparc/helper.c @@ -116,14 +116,16 @@ static target_ulong helper_sdiv_common(CPUSPARCState *env, target_ulong a, if (x1 == 0) { cpu_restore_state(env, GETPC()); helper_raise_exception(env, TT_DIV_ZERO); - } - - x0 = x0 / x1; - if ((int32_t) x0 != x0) { - x0 = x0 < 0 ? 0x80000000 : 0x7fffffff; + } else if (x1 == -1 && x0 == 0x8000000000000000) { + x0 = 0x7fffffff; overflow = 1; + } else { + x0 = x0 / x1; + if ((int32_t) x0 != x0) { + x0 = x0 < 0 ? 0x80000000 : 0x7fffffff; + overflow = 1; + } } - if (cc) { env->cc_dst = x0; env->cc_src2 = overflow; -------------------------------------------------------------------