All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	Martin Runge <Martin.Runge@rohde-schwarz.com>,
	Andreas Brief <Andreas.Brief@rohde-schwarz.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: Remove compat vdso support
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:37:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5320D3AB.5060002@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFyhS5jCWcxuK4bXKEPh+8HWbPE+gy1m4N9B-2HyT48+QA@mail.gmail.com>

On 03/12/2014 12:41 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> So my reaction was "don't do that".
> 
> But people pointing out that we can't do what x86-64 does made me
> think: we could avoid the whole "nasty code for a legacy case" by
> making it the *non*-legacy case. We could get rid of the fixmap
> HPET/VVAR entirely - on x86-64 (which can use those addresses) a
> PC-relative addressing is probably actually better anyway, so mapping
> them together with the vdso code shouldn't hurt.
> 

How would that deal with the legacy vsyscall case for x86-64?  Just rely
on the "legacy vsyscall emulation" (which seems to have its own class of
problems...)?

	-hpa



  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-03-12 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-11  1:03 [PATCH v2] x86: Remove compat vdso support Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-11  1:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-11  2:37   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-11  3:09     ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-11  4:10       ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-11  8:37         ` Ingo Molnar
2014-03-11  9:36         ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-11 14:53           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-11 15:30             ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-11 16:14               ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-11 16:30                 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-11 16:42                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-11 16:42                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-11 16:45                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-11 16:50                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-11 16:52                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-11 17:09                         ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-11 17:14                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-11 17:16                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-12  8:30                           ` Stefani Seibold
2014-03-12 14:41                             ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-12 15:46                               ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-12 16:04                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-12 16:18                                   ` Brian Gerst
2014-03-12 16:18                                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-12 19:41                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-12 20:52                                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-12 21:37                                   ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2014-03-12 21:45                                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-12 21:46                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-12 21:49                                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-12 23:06                                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-12 23:43                                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-12 23:46                                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-13 16:23                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-12 13:55                           ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-03-13  7:08                           ` George Spelvin
2014-03-11 17:03                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-11 17:07                       ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5320D3AB.5060002@linux.intel.com \
    --to=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Andreas.Brief@rohde-schwarz.com \
    --cc=Martin.Runge@rohde-schwarz.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=stefani@seibold.net \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.