From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Vaussard Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/9] ARM: dts: omap3-overo: Add HSUSB PHY Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 09:29:57 +0100 Message-ID: <53216C85.2020307@epfl.ch> References: <1394220139-1760-1-git-send-email-florian.vaussard@epfl.ch> <1394220139-1760-6-git-send-email-florian.vaussard@epfl.ch> <531D9452.6040501@ti.com> <531DD6A8.7010406@epfl.ch> <531EDAAC.8030509@ti.com> <20140312171955.GB30897@atomide.com> Reply-To: florian.vaussard@epfl.ch Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp0.epfl.ch ([128.178.224.218]:58466 "EHLO smtp0.epfl.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751286AbaCMIaC (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Mar 2014 04:30:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140312171955.GB30897@atomide.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren , Roger Quadros Cc: Benoit Cousson , Nishanth Menon , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On 03/12/2014 06:19 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Roger Quadros [140311 02:46]: >> >> Any sane design would maintain register offsets but it doesn't seem so with >> omap34xx vs omap36xx. So my assumption was wrong. >> >> I'll ack this patch. > > OK thanks, I'll apply the whole series with your ack to omap-for-v3.15/dt-overo. > Thanks! Florian From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: florian.vaussard@epfl.ch (Florian Vaussard) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 09:29:57 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v4 5/9] ARM: dts: omap3-overo: Add HSUSB PHY In-Reply-To: <20140312171955.GB30897@atomide.com> References: <1394220139-1760-1-git-send-email-florian.vaussard@epfl.ch> <1394220139-1760-6-git-send-email-florian.vaussard@epfl.ch> <531D9452.6040501@ti.com> <531DD6A8.7010406@epfl.ch> <531EDAAC.8030509@ti.com> <20140312171955.GB30897@atomide.com> Message-ID: <53216C85.2020307@epfl.ch> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 03/12/2014 06:19 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Roger Quadros [140311 02:46]: >> >> Any sane design would maintain register offsets but it doesn't seem so with >> omap34xx vs omap36xx. So my assumption was wrong. >> >> I'll ack this patch. > > OK thanks, I'll apply the whole series with your ack to omap-for-v3.15/dt-overo. > Thanks! Florian