From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754828AbaCMSJh (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Mar 2014 14:09:37 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:41320 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754485AbaCMSJg (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Mar 2014 14:09:36 -0400 Message-ID: <5321F418.1030304@zytor.com> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:08:24 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andy Lutomirski CC: Stefani Seibold , Greg KH , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , X86 ML , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Andi Kleen , Andrea Arcangeli , John Stultz , Pavel Emelyanov , Cyrill Gorcunov , andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, Martin Runge , Andreas Brief , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86, vdso32: handle 32 bit vDSO larger one page References: <1394664680-17799-1-git-send-email-stefani@seibold.net> <1394664680-17799-4-git-send-email-stefani@seibold.net> <5320E689.7060607@zytor.com> <5321D45C.7040504@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/13/2014 10:28 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > Does this mean you prefer the relocation approach to the compat vdso > removal approach? It seems like Linus is okay with either one. > Actually, thinking about it, removing it is probably better: a) gets rid of legacy code, making room for unification; b) either way enabling compat support (either relocation or disabling the vdso) has a performance penalty for *all* processes. The only way to avoid that is to have a vdso at a fixed addresses across all processes, either in the fixmap or in the user area (presumably at the very top.) -hpa