From: hdegoede@redhat.com (Hans de Goede)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] irq: Add a new IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED flag
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 19:17:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5321F647.1060506@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394733834-26839-2-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com>
Hi,
On 03/13/2014 07:03 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>
> This flag must be used in combination with handle_fasteoi_irq, when set
> handle_fasteoi_irq will delay the calling of chip->irq_eoi until the threaded
> handler has run.
>
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Note: I just noticed that we should also update the comment above
kernel/irq/chip.c: cond_unmask_irq() to no longer mention its gets called
from handle_fasteoi_irq() as that is no longer true.
Regards,
Hans
> ---
> include/linux/irq.h | 3 +++
> kernel/irq/chip.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> kernel/irq/internals.h | 1 +
> kernel/irq/manage.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h
> index 7dc1003..0f036fb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irq.h
> @@ -349,6 +349,8 @@ struct irq_chip {
> * IRQCHIP_ONOFFLINE_ENABLED: Only call irq_on/off_line callbacks
> * when irq enabled
> * IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE: Skip chip.irq_set_wake(), for this irq chip
> + * IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE: One shot does not require mask/unmask
> + * IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED: Chip requires eoi() on unmask in threaded mode
> */
> enum {
> IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED = (1 << 0),
> @@ -357,6 +359,7 @@ enum {
> IRQCHIP_ONOFFLINE_ENABLED = (1 << 3),
> IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE = (1 << 4),
> IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE = (1 << 5),
> + IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED = (1 << 6),
> };
>
> /* This include will go away once we isolated irq_desc usage to core code */
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c
> index dc04c16..6397df2 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
> @@ -281,6 +281,19 @@ void unmask_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
> }
> }
>
> +void unmask_threaded_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + struct irq_chip *chip = desc->irq_data.chip;
> +
> + if (chip->flags & IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED)
> + chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
> +
> + if (chip->irq_unmask) {
> + chip->irq_unmask(&desc->irq_data);
> + irq_state_clr_masked(desc);
> + }
> +}
> +
> /*
> * handle_nested_irq - Handle a nested irq from a irq thread
> * @irq: the interrupt number
> @@ -435,6 +448,27 @@ static inline void preflow_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
> static inline void preflow_handler(struct irq_desc *desc) { }
> #endif
>
> +static void cond_unmask_eoi_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irq_chip *chip)
> +{
> + if (!(desc->istate & IRQS_ONESHOT)) {
> + chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
> + return;
> + }
> + /*
> + * We need to unmask in the following cases:
> + * - Oneshot irq which did not wake the thread (caused by a
> + * spurious interrupt or a primary handler handling it
> + * completely).
> + */
> + if (!irqd_irq_disabled(&desc->irq_data) &&
> + irqd_irq_masked(&desc->irq_data) && !desc->threads_oneshot) {
> + chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
> + unmask_irq(desc);
> + } else if (!(chip->flags & IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED)) {
> + chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
> + }
> +}
> +
> /**
> * handle_fasteoi_irq - irq handler for transparent controllers
> * @irq: the interrupt number
> @@ -448,6 +482,8 @@ static inline void preflow_handler(struct irq_desc *desc) { }
> void
> handle_fasteoi_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> {
> + struct irq_chip *chip = desc->irq_data.chip;
> +
> raw_spin_lock(&desc->lock);
>
> if (unlikely(irqd_irq_inprogress(&desc->irq_data)))
> @@ -473,18 +509,14 @@ handle_fasteoi_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> preflow_handler(desc);
> handle_irq_event(desc);
>
> - if (desc->istate & IRQS_ONESHOT)
> - cond_unmask_irq(desc);
> + cond_unmask_eoi_irq(desc, chip);
>
> -out_eoi:
> - desc->irq_data.chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
> -out_unlock:
> raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
> return;
> out:
> - if (!(desc->irq_data.chip->flags & IRQCHIP_EOI_IF_HANDLED))
> - goto out_eoi;
> - goto out_unlock;
> + if (!(chip->flags & IRQCHIP_EOI_IF_HANDLED))
> + chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
> + raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/internals.h b/kernel/irq/internals.h
> index 001fa5b..e98bb56 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/internals.h
> +++ b/kernel/irq/internals.h
> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ extern void irq_percpu_enable(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int cpu);
> extern void irq_percpu_disable(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int cpu);
> extern void mask_irq(struct irq_desc *desc);
> extern void unmask_irq(struct irq_desc *desc);
> +extern void unmask_threaded_irq(struct irq_desc *desc);
>
> extern void init_kstat_irqs(struct irq_desc *desc, int node, int nr);
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
> index 481a13c..9147fef 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
> @@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ again:
>
> if (!desc->threads_oneshot && !irqd_irq_disabled(&desc->irq_data) &&
> irqd_irq_masked(&desc->irq_data))
> - unmask_irq(desc);
> + unmask_threaded_irq(desc);
>
> out_unlock:
> raw_spin_unlock_irq(&desc->lock);
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
devicetree <devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] irq: Add a new IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED flag
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 19:17:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5321F647.1060506@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394733834-26839-2-git-send-email-hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Hi,
On 03/13/2014 07:03 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
>
> This flag must be used in combination with handle_fasteoi_irq, when set
> handle_fasteoi_irq will delay the calling of chip->irq_eoi until the threaded
> handler has run.
>
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Note: I just noticed that we should also update the comment above
kernel/irq/chip.c: cond_unmask_irq() to no longer mention its gets called
from handle_fasteoi_irq() as that is no longer true.
Regards,
Hans
> ---
> include/linux/irq.h | 3 +++
> kernel/irq/chip.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> kernel/irq/internals.h | 1 +
> kernel/irq/manage.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h
> index 7dc1003..0f036fb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irq.h
> @@ -349,6 +349,8 @@ struct irq_chip {
> * IRQCHIP_ONOFFLINE_ENABLED: Only call irq_on/off_line callbacks
> * when irq enabled
> * IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE: Skip chip.irq_set_wake(), for this irq chip
> + * IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE: One shot does not require mask/unmask
> + * IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED: Chip requires eoi() on unmask in threaded mode
> */
> enum {
> IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED = (1 << 0),
> @@ -357,6 +359,7 @@ enum {
> IRQCHIP_ONOFFLINE_ENABLED = (1 << 3),
> IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE = (1 << 4),
> IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE = (1 << 5),
> + IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED = (1 << 6),
> };
>
> /* This include will go away once we isolated irq_desc usage to core code */
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c
> index dc04c16..6397df2 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
> @@ -281,6 +281,19 @@ void unmask_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
> }
> }
>
> +void unmask_threaded_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + struct irq_chip *chip = desc->irq_data.chip;
> +
> + if (chip->flags & IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED)
> + chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
> +
> + if (chip->irq_unmask) {
> + chip->irq_unmask(&desc->irq_data);
> + irq_state_clr_masked(desc);
> + }
> +}
> +
> /*
> * handle_nested_irq - Handle a nested irq from a irq thread
> * @irq: the interrupt number
> @@ -435,6 +448,27 @@ static inline void preflow_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
> static inline void preflow_handler(struct irq_desc *desc) { }
> #endif
>
> +static void cond_unmask_eoi_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irq_chip *chip)
> +{
> + if (!(desc->istate & IRQS_ONESHOT)) {
> + chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
> + return;
> + }
> + /*
> + * We need to unmask in the following cases:
> + * - Oneshot irq which did not wake the thread (caused by a
> + * spurious interrupt or a primary handler handling it
> + * completely).
> + */
> + if (!irqd_irq_disabled(&desc->irq_data) &&
> + irqd_irq_masked(&desc->irq_data) && !desc->threads_oneshot) {
> + chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
> + unmask_irq(desc);
> + } else if (!(chip->flags & IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED)) {
> + chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
> + }
> +}
> +
> /**
> * handle_fasteoi_irq - irq handler for transparent controllers
> * @irq: the interrupt number
> @@ -448,6 +482,8 @@ static inline void preflow_handler(struct irq_desc *desc) { }
> void
> handle_fasteoi_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> {
> + struct irq_chip *chip = desc->irq_data.chip;
> +
> raw_spin_lock(&desc->lock);
>
> if (unlikely(irqd_irq_inprogress(&desc->irq_data)))
> @@ -473,18 +509,14 @@ handle_fasteoi_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> preflow_handler(desc);
> handle_irq_event(desc);
>
> - if (desc->istate & IRQS_ONESHOT)
> - cond_unmask_irq(desc);
> + cond_unmask_eoi_irq(desc, chip);
>
> -out_eoi:
> - desc->irq_data.chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
> -out_unlock:
> raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
> return;
> out:
> - if (!(desc->irq_data.chip->flags & IRQCHIP_EOI_IF_HANDLED))
> - goto out_eoi;
> - goto out_unlock;
> + if (!(chip->flags & IRQCHIP_EOI_IF_HANDLED))
> + chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
> + raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/internals.h b/kernel/irq/internals.h
> index 001fa5b..e98bb56 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/internals.h
> +++ b/kernel/irq/internals.h
> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ extern void irq_percpu_enable(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int cpu);
> extern void irq_percpu_disable(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int cpu);
> extern void mask_irq(struct irq_desc *desc);
> extern void unmask_irq(struct irq_desc *desc);
> +extern void unmask_threaded_irq(struct irq_desc *desc);
>
> extern void init_kstat_irqs(struct irq_desc *desc, int node, int nr);
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
> index 481a13c..9147fef 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
> @@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ again:
>
> if (!desc->threads_oneshot && !irqd_irq_disabled(&desc->irq_data) &&
> irqd_irq_masked(&desc->irq_data))
> - unmask_irq(desc);
> + unmask_threaded_irq(desc);
>
> out_unlock:
> raw_spin_unlock_irq(&desc->lock);
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] irq: Add a new IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED flag
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 19:17:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5321F647.1060506@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394733834-26839-2-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com>
Hi,
On 03/13/2014 07:03 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>
> This flag must be used in combination with handle_fasteoi_irq, when set
> handle_fasteoi_irq will delay the calling of chip->irq_eoi until the threaded
> handler has run.
>
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Note: I just noticed that we should also update the comment above
kernel/irq/chip.c: cond_unmask_irq() to no longer mention its gets called
from handle_fasteoi_irq() as that is no longer true.
Regards,
Hans
> ---
> include/linux/irq.h | 3 +++
> kernel/irq/chip.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> kernel/irq/internals.h | 1 +
> kernel/irq/manage.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h
> index 7dc1003..0f036fb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irq.h
> @@ -349,6 +349,8 @@ struct irq_chip {
> * IRQCHIP_ONOFFLINE_ENABLED: Only call irq_on/off_line callbacks
> * when irq enabled
> * IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE: Skip chip.irq_set_wake(), for this irq chip
> + * IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE: One shot does not require mask/unmask
> + * IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED: Chip requires eoi() on unmask in threaded mode
> */
> enum {
> IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED = (1 << 0),
> @@ -357,6 +359,7 @@ enum {
> IRQCHIP_ONOFFLINE_ENABLED = (1 << 3),
> IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE = (1 << 4),
> IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE = (1 << 5),
> + IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED = (1 << 6),
> };
>
> /* This include will go away once we isolated irq_desc usage to core code */
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c
> index dc04c16..6397df2 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
> @@ -281,6 +281,19 @@ void unmask_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
> }
> }
>
> +void unmask_threaded_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + struct irq_chip *chip = desc->irq_data.chip;
> +
> + if (chip->flags & IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED)
> + chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
> +
> + if (chip->irq_unmask) {
> + chip->irq_unmask(&desc->irq_data);
> + irq_state_clr_masked(desc);
> + }
> +}
> +
> /*
> * handle_nested_irq - Handle a nested irq from a irq thread
> * @irq: the interrupt number
> @@ -435,6 +448,27 @@ static inline void preflow_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
> static inline void preflow_handler(struct irq_desc *desc) { }
> #endif
>
> +static void cond_unmask_eoi_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irq_chip *chip)
> +{
> + if (!(desc->istate & IRQS_ONESHOT)) {
> + chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
> + return;
> + }
> + /*
> + * We need to unmask in the following cases:
> + * - Oneshot irq which did not wake the thread (caused by a
> + * spurious interrupt or a primary handler handling it
> + * completely).
> + */
> + if (!irqd_irq_disabled(&desc->irq_data) &&
> + irqd_irq_masked(&desc->irq_data) && !desc->threads_oneshot) {
> + chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
> + unmask_irq(desc);
> + } else if (!(chip->flags & IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED)) {
> + chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
> + }
> +}
> +
> /**
> * handle_fasteoi_irq - irq handler for transparent controllers
> * @irq: the interrupt number
> @@ -448,6 +482,8 @@ static inline void preflow_handler(struct irq_desc *desc) { }
> void
> handle_fasteoi_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> {
> + struct irq_chip *chip = desc->irq_data.chip;
> +
> raw_spin_lock(&desc->lock);
>
> if (unlikely(irqd_irq_inprogress(&desc->irq_data)))
> @@ -473,18 +509,14 @@ handle_fasteoi_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> preflow_handler(desc);
> handle_irq_event(desc);
>
> - if (desc->istate & IRQS_ONESHOT)
> - cond_unmask_irq(desc);
> + cond_unmask_eoi_irq(desc, chip);
>
> -out_eoi:
> - desc->irq_data.chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
> -out_unlock:
> raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
> return;
> out:
> - if (!(desc->irq_data.chip->flags & IRQCHIP_EOI_IF_HANDLED))
> - goto out_eoi;
> - goto out_unlock;
> + if (!(chip->flags & IRQCHIP_EOI_IF_HANDLED))
> + chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data);
> + raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/internals.h b/kernel/irq/internals.h
> index 001fa5b..e98bb56 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/internals.h
> +++ b/kernel/irq/internals.h
> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ extern void irq_percpu_enable(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int cpu);
> extern void irq_percpu_disable(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int cpu);
> extern void mask_irq(struct irq_desc *desc);
> extern void unmask_irq(struct irq_desc *desc);
> +extern void unmask_threaded_irq(struct irq_desc *desc);
>
> extern void init_kstat_irqs(struct irq_desc *desc, int node, int nr);
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
> index 481a13c..9147fef 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
> @@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ again:
>
> if (!desc->threads_oneshot && !irqd_irq_disabled(&desc->irq_data) &&
> irqd_irq_masked(&desc->irq_data))
> - unmask_irq(desc);
> + unmask_threaded_irq(desc);
>
> out_unlock:
> raw_spin_unlock_irq(&desc->lock);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-13 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-13 18:03 [PATCH v3 0/4] irq: sun4i IRQ 0 / ENMI fixes Hans de Goede
2014-03-13 18:03 ` Hans de Goede
2014-03-13 18:03 ` Hans de Goede
2014-03-13 18:03 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] irq: Add a new IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED flag Hans de Goede
2014-03-13 18:03 ` Hans de Goede
2014-03-13 18:03 ` Hans de Goede
2014-03-13 18:17 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2014-03-13 18:17 ` Hans de Goede
2014-03-13 18:17 ` Hans de Goede
2014-03-14 12:55 ` [tip:irq/core] genirq: " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-13 18:03 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] irqchip: sun4i: Fix irq 0 not working Hans de Goede
2014-03-13 18:03 ` Hans de Goede
2014-03-13 18:03 ` Hans de Goede
2014-03-14 12:55 ` [tip:irq/core] " tip-bot for Hans de Goede
2014-03-13 18:03 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] irqchip: sun4i: Fix a comment about mask register initialization Hans de Goede
2014-03-13 18:03 ` Hans de Goede
2014-03-13 18:03 ` Hans de Goede
2014-03-14 12:55 ` [tip:irq/core] " tip-bot for Hans de Goede
2014-03-13 18:03 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] irqchip: sun4i: Don't ack IRQs != 0, fix acking of IRQ 0 Hans de Goede
2014-03-13 18:03 ` Hans de Goede
2014-03-13 18:03 ` Hans de Goede
2014-03-14 12:55 ` [tip:irq/core] irqchip: sun4i: Don't ack IRQs > " tip-bot for Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5321F647.1060506@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.